PZT vs. IDMO
PZT (Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PZT is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PZT returned 1.74%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for IDMO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PZT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
PZT vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZT achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 8.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PZT has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 1.74%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.47% annualized return.
PZT
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 2.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
IDMO
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.47%
PZT vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 2.66% | 1.76% | 1.17% | 7.57% | -13.04% | 2.67% | 5.89% | 9.52% | -0.55% | 6.21% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 8.27% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZT and IDMO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.06 |
The correlation between PZT and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZT vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
PZT
IDMO
PZT vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZT | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.22 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 1.77 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 6.94 | +4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZT vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZT drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZT and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZT | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -39.38% | +16.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -12.31% | +9.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.00% | -12.65% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.13% | -27.07% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.13% | -31.34% | +12.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -3.93% | +2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -9.70% | +5.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 3.13% | -2.28% |
Volatility
PZT vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) is 1.14%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that PZT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZT | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 5.93% | -4.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.59% | 16.86% | -13.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.58% | 18.53% | -13.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.64% | 18.14% | -11.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.92% | 17.89% | -10.97% |
PZT vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZT vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
PZT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than IDMO's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.69% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.04% | 2.82% | 2.66% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.73% | 3.01% | 2.94% | 3.36% | 3.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZT and IDMO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDMO has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to PZT (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZT dropped -22.73% vs IDMO's -39.38%.
On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.47% vs 1.74% for PZT. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PZT has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.47% return vs 1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZT.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 3.63% for PZT.
PZT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IDMO is Momentum. PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PZT and 0.25% for IDMO.
PZT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZT and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer