PZT vs. IBMN
PZT (Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF) and IBMN (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - PZT tracks the ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni while IBMN tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2025 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PZT returned -0.03%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBMN. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PZT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMN.
Performance
PZT vs. IBMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PZT
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- 9.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
IBMN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
PZT vs. IBMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 2.87% | 1.76% | 1.17% | 7.57% | -13.04% | 2.67% | 5.89% | 9.52% | 2.31% |
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 2.49% | 2.33% | 2.42% | -4.43% | -0.41% | 4.83% | 6.87% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZT and IBMN is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2018 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PZT and IBMN has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZT vs. IBMN — Risk / Return Rank
PZT
IBMN
PZT vs. IBMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZT | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.66 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 6.02 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 24.21 | -13.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZT | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.12 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.28 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.58 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
PZT vs. IBMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZT drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, which is greater than IBMN's maximum drawdown of -12.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZT and IBMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZT | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -12.40% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -0.25% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.00% | -1.10% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.13% | -7.36% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.05% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -1.81% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.10% | +0.83% |
Volatility
PZT vs. IBMN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) at 0.00%. This indicates that PZT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZT | IBMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | 0.00% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.45% | 0.50% | +2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.75% | 0.71% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.62% | 1.80% | +4.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.96% | 3.89% | +3.07% |
PZT vs. IBMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMN's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZT vs. IBMN - Dividend Comparison
PZT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than IBMN's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 1.14% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 1.72% | 0.97% | 0.70% | 1.11% | 1.65% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PZT Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.58% | 3.43% | 3.04% | 2.82% | 2.66% | 2.77% | 2.55% | 2.73% | 3.01% | 2.94% | 3.36% | 3.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZT and IBMN have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZT has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to IBMN (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZT dropped -22.73% vs IBMN's -12.40%.
On 5-year performance, IBMN leads with 0.47% vs -0.03% for PZT. On fees, IBMN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMN has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBMN has performed better with a 0.47% return vs -0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBMN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZT.
PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.14% for IBMN.
PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni, while IBMN tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2025 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PZT and 0.18% for IBMN.
IBMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZT and IBMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer