IBMN vs. IBDQ
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ).
IBMN and IBDQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBMN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2025 Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2018. IBDQ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg December 2025 Maturity Corporate. It was launched on Mar 12, 2015. Both IBMN and IBDQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBMN or IBDQ.
Correlation
The correlation between IBMN and IBDQ is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IBMN vs. IBDQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IBMN:
3.19
IBDQ:
7.01
IBMN:
5.12
IBDQ:
12.46
IBMN:
1.70
IBDQ:
3.41
IBMN:
0.97
IBDQ:
2.47
IBMN:
23.95
IBDQ:
129.61
IBMN:
0.13%
IBDQ:
0.04%
IBMN:
0.94%
IBDQ:
0.78%
IBMN:
-12.41%
IBDQ:
-15.19%
IBMN:
-0.05%
IBDQ:
-0.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMN achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than IBDQ's 0.61% return.
IBMN
0.52%
0.35%
1.31%
3.04%
0.66%
N/A
IBDQ
0.61%
0.37%
2.50%
5.50%
1.86%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBMN vs. IBDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IBDQ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBMN vs. IBDQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IBMN
IBDQ
IBMN vs. IBDQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBMN vs. IBDQ - Dividend Comparison
IBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than IBDQ's 3.84% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 0.97% | 0.70% | 1.10% | 1.78% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBDQ iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF | 3.84% | 3.82% | 3.27% | 2.24% | 2.06% | 2.51% | 3.21% | 3.52% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.64% |
Drawdowns
IBMN vs. IBDQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMN drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, smaller than the maximum IBDQ drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMN and IBDQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBMN vs. IBDQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) has a higher volatility of 0.23% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Corporate ETF (IBDQ) at 0.18%. This indicates that IBMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.