PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZT vs. FMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PZT vs. FMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PZT vs. FMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZT achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than FMUN's -0.17% return.


PZT

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
0.25%
6M
1.39%
1Y
2.84%
3Y*
2.31%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
1.83%

FMUN

1D
0.23%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
1.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PZT vs. FMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUN's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PZT vs. FMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZT
PZT Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
PZT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZT Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PZT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZT vs. FMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PZTFMUNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.67

PZT vs. FMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PZTFMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.00

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between PZT and FMUN is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PZT vs. FMUN - Dividend Comparison

PZT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than FMUN's 3.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.57%3.43%3.04%2.82%2.66%2.77%2.55%2.73%3.01%2.94%3.36%3.40%
FMUN
Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF
3.25%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PZT vs. FMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZT drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, which is greater than FMUN's maximum drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZT and FMUN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PZTFMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.73%

-3.21%

-19.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-2.49%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-0.67%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

Volatility

PZT vs. FMUN - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PZTFMUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.11%

4.16%

+2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

4.16%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

4.16%

+2.77%