PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZT vs. BSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZT vs. BSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZT achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than BSSX's 0.90% return.


PZT

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.38%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.17%
1Y
9.52%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
1.90%

BSSX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.50%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZT vs. BSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%1.76%1.17%6.30%
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
0.90%3.79%-0.09%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PZT and BSSX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

0.55

The correlation between PZT and BSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZT vs. BSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZT
PZT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PZT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PZT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZT Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BSSX
BSSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZT vs. BSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) and Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PZTBSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.14

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.29

6.69

+3.60

PZT vs. BSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZT Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the BSSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZT and BSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PZTBSSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.09

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.57

-0.20

Drawdowns

PZT vs. BSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZT drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, which is greater than BSSX's maximum drawdown of -8.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZT and BSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZTBSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.73%

-8.12%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-3.28%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-1.12%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-3.26%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.05%

-0.12%

Volatility

PZT vs. BSSX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZT) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) at 1.16%. This indicates that PZT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZTBSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

1.16%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

2.38%

+1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

3.36%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

7.83%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.96%

7.83%

-0.87%

PZT vs. BSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BSSX's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZT vs. BSSX - Dividend Comparison

PZT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than BSSX's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
3.31%3.27%3.29%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PZT
Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.58%3.43%3.04%2.82%2.66%2.77%2.55%2.73%3.01%2.94%3.36%3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZT and BSSX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PZT has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to BSSX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZT dropped -22.73% vs BSSX's -8.12%.

On 1-year performance, PZT leads with 9.52% vs 6.99% for BSSX. On fees, BSSX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSSX has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PZT has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSSX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZT.

PZT has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 3.31% for BSSX.

PZT tracks ICE BofA New York Long-Term Core Plus Muni, while BSSX tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2033 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PZT and 0.18% for BSSX.

BSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZT and BSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer