PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZRMX vs. PSLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZRMX vs. PSLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZRMX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than PSLDX's 10.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PZRMX has underperformed PSLDX with an annualized return of 7.33%, while PSLDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.63% annualized return.


PZRMX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.00%
YTD
7.08%
6M
7.54%
1Y
17.20%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
7.33%

PSLDX

1D
0.21%
1M
5.66%
YTD
10.00%
6M
9.38%
1Y
34.01%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
14.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZRMX vs. PSLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZRMX
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund
7.08%16.18%12.47%5.95%-5.42%13.22%8.92%10.42%-4.05%7.96%
PSLDX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I
10.00%20.34%15.41%27.93%-43.18%25.85%37.80%60.43%-9.31%33.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PZRMX and PSLDX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.49

The correlation between PZRMX and PSLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZRMX vs. PSLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZRMX
PZRMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PZRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PZRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PSLDX
PSLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PSLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZRMX vs. PSLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PZRMXPSLDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.07

2.07

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.22

2.77

+1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.37

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.42

2.48

+2.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.29

10.05

+12.24

PZRMX vs. PSLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZRMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the PSLDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZRMX and PSLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PZRMXPSLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

2.07

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.26

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.69

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.67

+0.02

Drawdowns

PZRMX vs. PSLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZRMX drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, smaller than the maximum PSLDX drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZRMX and PSLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZRMXPSLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.71%

-55.25%

+35.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.35%

-13.70%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.96%

-24.03%

+19.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.57%

-49.32%

+34.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.18%

-49.32%

+31.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

0.00%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-10.65%

+6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

3.38%

-2.56%

Volatility

PZRMX vs. PSLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) is 1.59%, while PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that PZRMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZRMXPSLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

5.38%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.66%

13.18%

-8.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.90%

16.37%

-10.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.37%

22.71%

-14.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.55%

21.32%

-13.77%

PZRMX vs. PSLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZRMX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PSLDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZRMX vs. PSLDX - Dividend Comparison

PZRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than PSLDX's 9.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSLDX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I
9.46%12.92%15.23%3.67%2.66%38.80%12.89%18.91%15.58%24.52%11.55%12.08%
PZRMX
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund
2.19%2.35%9.84%0.00%13.86%11.20%0.54%2.56%11.15%6.06%0.16%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZRMX and PSLDX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLDX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to PZRMX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZRMX dropped -19.71% vs PSLDX's -55.25%.

PZRMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZRMX and PSLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer