PZRMX vs. FRGAX
PZRMX (PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund) and FRGAX (Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, PZRMX returned 14.07%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for FRGAX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PZRMX charges 1.18%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FRGAX.
Performance
PZRMX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZRMX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 9.13% return.
PZRMX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 7.54%
- 1Y
- 17.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
FRGAX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 9.13%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PZRMX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZRMX PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund | 7.08% | 16.18% | 12.47% | 5.95% | 0.81% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 9.13% | 17.10% | 12.91% | 17.57% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZRMX and FRGAX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PZRMX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZRMX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank
PZRMX
FRGAX
PZRMX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZRMX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.07 | 2.56 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.22 | 3.63 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.48 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.42 | 3.33 | +2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.29 | 14.92 | +7.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZRMX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | 2.56 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.53 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
PZRMX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZRMX drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZRMX and FRGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZRMX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.71% | -11.77% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.35% | -7.03% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.96% | -11.77% | +6.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | 0.00% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -1.59% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 1.57% | -0.75% |
Volatility
PZRMX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) is 1.59%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that PZRMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZRMX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 2.75% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.66% | 7.21% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.90% | 9.04% | -3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.37% | 10.32% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 10.32% | -2.77% |
PZRMX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZRMX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
PZRMX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison
PZRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than FRGAX's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 1.84% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.77% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PZRMX PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund | 2.19% | 2.35% | 9.84% | 0.00% | 13.86% | 11.20% | 0.54% | 2.56% | 11.15% | 6.06% | 0.16% | 2.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PZRMX and FRGAX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRGAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to PZRMX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZRMX dropped -19.71% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.
PZRMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZRMX and FRGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer