PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZRMX vs. AYBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZRMX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZRMX achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 14.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PZRMX has underperformed AYBLX with an annualized return of 7.03%, while AYBLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.59% annualized return.


PZRMX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
4.89%
6M
4.65%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
7.03%

AYBLX

1D
0.93%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.22%
6M
14.00%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PZRMX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PZRMX
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund
4.89%16.18%12.47%5.95%-5.42%13.22%8.92%10.42%-4.05%7.96%
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
14.22%19.80%9.64%15.41%-14.39%15.48%12.92%22.22%-4.43%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PZRMX and AYBLX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.43

The correlation between PZRMX and AYBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZRMX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PZRMX
PZRMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PZRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PZRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

AYBLX
AYBLX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AYBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AYBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PZRMX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PZRMXAYBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.61

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

5.12

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.26

23.78

-9.52

PZRMX vs. AYBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZRMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is lower than the AYBLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZRMX and AYBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PZRMX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZRMX drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, smaller than the maximum AYBLX drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZRMX and AYBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZRMXAYBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.71%

-36.28%

+16.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.35%

-6.41%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.96%

-13.39%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.57%

-20.26%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.18%

-24.24%

+6.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-0.32%

-2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-3.78%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.38%

-0.44%

Volatility

PZRMX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) is 1.60%, while Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that PZRMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZRMXAYBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

3.74%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.79%

7.86%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

9.94%

-3.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.35%

11.13%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.55%

11.33%

-3.78%

PZRMX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZRMX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZRMX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison

PZRMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
3.24%3.58%2.59%1.76%3.23%8.61%4.12%6.03%9.97%9.42%2.63%4.14%
PZRMX
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund
8.36%2.35%9.84%0.00%13.86%11.20%0.54%2.56%11.15%6.06%0.16%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZRMX and AYBLX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AYBLX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to PZRMX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZRMX dropped -19.71% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.

AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZRMX and AYBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer