PZIEX vs. FPADX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PZIEX (Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class) and FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. PZIEX is actively managed, while FPADX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PZIEX returned 11.00%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for FPADX. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PZIEX charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FPADX.

Performance

PZIEX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZIEX achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than FPADX's 16.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PZIEX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 11.00%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.

PZIEX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 2.58%
• 6M: -1.10%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 1Y: 28.39%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 11.78%
• 10Y*: 11.00%
• ALL TIME*: 9.21%

FPADX

• 1D: 3.98%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: 7.70%
• YTD: 16.52%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: 17.79%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 8.35%
• ALL TIME*: 5.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PZIEX Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PZIEX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PZIEX Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class	11.34%	35.49%	4.54%	20.73%	-5.67%	6.65%	8.43%	13.57%	-10.23%	29.98%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	16.52%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	17.84%	18.28%	-14.65%	35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PZIEX and FPADX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between PZIEX and FPADX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PZIEX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PZIEX

PZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 57
PZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
PZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
PZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PZIEX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PZIEX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.42	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	1.92	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.27	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	2.34	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.16	7.44	-2.28

PZIEX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PZIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PZIEX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PZIEX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZIEX drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZIEX and FPADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PZIEX	FPADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.59%	-39.16%	-5.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.79%	-13.83%	+1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.40%	-16.09%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.22%	-34.43%	+10.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.59%	-39.16%	-5.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.07%	-10.40%	+3.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.54%	-13.18%	+3.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.86%	4.33%	+0.53%

Volatility

PZIEX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) is 4.14%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) has a volatility of 9.49%. This indicates that PZIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PZIEX	FPADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	9.49%	-5.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.76%	20.91%	-7.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.96%	22.72%	-6.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.92%	18.12%	-3.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.33%	18.25%	-2.92%

PZIEX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZIEX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

PZIEX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

PZIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than FPADX's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	2.02%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%
PZIEX Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class	4.32%	4.81%	7.38%	5.79%	2.08%	2.79%	1.28%	6.32%	1.28%	1.41%	0.98%	2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PZIEX and FPADX in my portfolio?

PZIEX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PZIEX or FPADX?

FPADX has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to PZIEX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZIEX dropped -44.59% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PZIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.