PZIEX vs. EMF
Compare and contrast key facts about Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF).
PZIEX is an actively managed fund by Pzena. It was launched on Mar 31, 2014. EMF is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 27, 1987.
Performance
PZIEX vs. EMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PZIEX vs. EMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZIEX Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class | 4.56% | 35.49% | 4.54% | 20.73% | -5.67% | 6.65% | 8.43% | 13.57% | -10.23% | 29.98% |
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 3.98% | 58.20% | 6.56% | 8.84% | -21.53% | -8.23% | 24.48% | 27.20% | -14.78% | 53.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZIEX achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly higher than EMF's 3.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PZIEX has underperformed EMF with an annualized return of 11.43%, while EMF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.50% annualized return.
PZIEX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -11.82%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
EMF
- 1D
- 4.67%
- 1M
- -14.87%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PZIEX vs. EMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZIEX has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EMF's 1.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PZIEX vs. EMF — Risk / Return Rank
PZIEX
EMF
PZIEX vs. EMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZIEX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 2.29 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 2.78 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 2.49 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 10.41 | -1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZIEX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.29 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.30 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.62 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.20 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between PZIEX and EMF is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PZIEX vs. EMF - Dividend Comparison
PZIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than EMF's 9.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZIEX Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class | 4.60% | 4.81% | 7.38% | 5.79% | 2.08% | 2.79% | 1.28% | 6.32% | 1.28% | 1.41% | 0.98% | 2.23% |
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 9.47% | 9.73% | 4.28% | 6.22% | 9.89% | 6.92% | 3.51% | 7.36% | 5.92% | 12.11% | 1.62% | 12.81% |
Drawdowns
PZIEX vs. EMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZIEX drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum EMF drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZIEX and EMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZIEX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -76.97% | +32.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -19.48% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -45.87% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | -47.65% | +3.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.73% | -15.72% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -29.12% | +19.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 4.66% | -1.37% |
Volatility
PZIEX vs. EMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) is 7.69%, while Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that PZIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PZIEX | EMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 12.00% | -4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 17.23% | -5.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.48% | 22.15% | -6.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 19.85% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.31% | 20.28% | -4.97% |