PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PZA vs. TAXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PZA vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZA) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PZA achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than TAXS's 1.10% return.


PZA

1D
0.48%
1M
-2.19%
6M
0.39%
YTD
1.27%
1Y
7.20%
3Y*
2.97%
5Y*
-0.42%
10Y*
1.67%
ALL TIME*
3.14%

TAXS

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.10%
6M
0.52%
YTD
1.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.95M$31.47M$27.68M
$420.04K$652.32K$965.85K

PZA vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PZA and TAXS is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PZA vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PZA
PZA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PZA vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PZA) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PZATAXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

PZA vs. TAXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PZA vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PZA drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZA and TAXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PZATAXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.49%

-0.84%

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-0.13%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-0.22%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

Volatility

PZA vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PZATAXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

1.04%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

1.04%

+4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.10%

1.04%

+6.06%

PZA vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PZA has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PZA vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison

PZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than TAXS's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PZA
Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
3.75%3.55%3.22%2.91%2.68%2.34%2.44%2.81%3.19%3.04%3.23%3.59%
TAXS
Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
2.25%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PZA and TAXS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PZA.

PZA has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 2.25% for TAXS.

PZA tracks BofA ML National Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index, while TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PZA and 0.05% for TAXS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PZA and TAXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer