PYSGX vs. LCCMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PYSGX (Payden Strategic Income Fund) and LCCMX (Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, PYSGX returned 3.40%/yr vs 4.26%/yr for LCCMX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYSGX charges 0.85%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for LCCMX.

Performance

PYSGX vs. LCCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYSGX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than LCCMX's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PYSGX has underperformed LCCMX with an annualized return of 3.40%, while LCCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.26% annualized return.

PYSGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 1.12%
• 1Y: 5.93%
• 3Y*: 5.95%
• 5Y*: 2.75%
• 10Y*: 3.40%

LCCMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 6.59%
• 1Y: 11.06%
• 3Y*: 14.65%
• 5Y*: 6.13%
• 10Y*: 4.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYSGX vs. LCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYSGX Payden Strategic Income Fund	0.83%	6.85%	5.46%	7.42%	-6.61%	1.72%	6.20%	8.33%	-0.52%	4.24%
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund	3.89%	9.73%	18.51%	13.73%	-13.30%	1.30%	7.52%	0.65%	2.35%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PYSGX and LCCMX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.25

The correlation between PYSGX and LCCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PYSGX vs. LCCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYSGX

PYSGX Risk / Return Rank: 75
PYSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PYSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PYSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PYSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PYSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

LCCMX

LCCMX Risk / Return Rank: 75
LCCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
LCCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LCCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LCCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LCCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYSGX vs. LCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYSGX	LCCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	2.46	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.15	5.36	-1.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	2.01	-0.45
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	2.96	+0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.04	10.42	+1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYSGX vs. LCCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the LCCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYSGX and LCCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYSGX	LCCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	2.46	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	1.06	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.20	0.67	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	0.81	+0.42

Drawdowns

PYSGX vs. LCCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYSGX drawdown since its inception was -12.70%, smaller than the maximum LCCMX drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYSGX and LCCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYSGX	LCCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.70%	-24.57%	+11.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.95%	-3.76%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.22%	-3.76%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.97%	-19.20%	+9.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.70%	-24.57%	+11.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	0.00%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.40%	-2.80%	+1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.49%	1.06%	-0.57%

Volatility

PYSGX vs. LCCMX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) at 0.68%. This indicates that PYSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYSGX	LCCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	0.68%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.70%	4.06%	-2.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20%	4.53%	-2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.89%	5.84%	-2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.85%	6.35%	-3.50%

PYSGX vs. LCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYSGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCMX's 2.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYSGX vs. LCCMX - Dividend Comparison

PYSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than LCCMX's 8.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund	8.53%	8.93%	10.39%	8.55%	5.68%	2.11%	2.11%	2.98%	2.89%	2.10%	2.01%	2.75%
PYSGX Payden Strategic Income Fund	4.75%	5.15%	5.22%	4.42%	3.76%	3.38%	2.90%	3.25%	3.27%	2.75%	2.70%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYSGX and LCCMX in my portfolio?

PYSGX and LCCMX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYSGX or LCCMX?

PYSGX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to LCCMX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYSGX dropped -12.70% vs LCCMX's -24.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.