PYSGX vs. GPARX
Compare and contrast key facts about Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX).
PYSGX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on May 8, 2014. GPARX is managed by GuidePath. It was launched on Apr 29, 2011.
Performance
PYSGX vs. GPARX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PYSGX vs. GPARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYSGX Payden Strategic Income Fund | -0.29% | 6.85% | 5.46% | 7.42% | -6.61% | 1.72% | 6.20% | 8.33% | -0.52% | 4.24% |
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund | 5.39% | 7.42% | 4.20% | 6.87% | -10.82% | 0.75% | 3.92% | 7.47% | -1.64% | 4.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYSGX achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than GPARX's 5.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PYSGX having a 3.39% annualized return and GPARX not far behind at 3.33%.
PYSGX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
GPARX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PYSGX vs. GPARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYSGX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GPARX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PYSGX vs. GPARX — Risk / Return Rank
PYSGX
GPARX
PYSGX vs. GPARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYSGX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 1.73 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.20 | 2.29 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.44 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 11.20 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYSGX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.73 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.54 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.20 | 0.79 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.76 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between PYSGX and GPARX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PYSGX vs. GPARX - Dividend Comparison
PYSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than GPARX's 3.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYSGX Payden Strategic Income Fund | 4.91% | 5.15% | 5.22% | 4.42% | 3.76% | 3.38% | 2.90% | 3.25% | 3.27% | 2.75% | 2.70% | 2.30% |
GPARX GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund | 3.14% | 3.31% | 4.99% | 4.81% | 2.42% | 1.99% | 2.45% | 2.76% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 3.17% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
PYSGX vs. GPARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYSGX drawdown since its inception was -12.70%, smaller than the maximum GPARX drawdown of -15.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYSGX and GPARX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYSGX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.70% | -15.56% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.08% | -4.68% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.97% | -15.56% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.70% | -15.56% | +2.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.88% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -2.40% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 1.02% | -0.43% |
Volatility
PYSGX vs. GPARX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Payden Strategic Income Fund (PYSGX) is 1.06%, while GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that PYSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PYSGX | GPARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 2.14% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.48% | 6.13% | -4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 6.57% | -3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.87% | 4.94% | -2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.83% | 4.23% | -1.40% |