PYPY vs. IVVW
PYPY (Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. PYPY is actively managed, while IVVW is passively managed. Over the past year, PYPY returned -39.20% vs 20.07% for IVVW. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYPY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.
Performance
PYPY vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPY achieves a -23.28% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 4.84% return.
PYPY
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- -12.23%
- YTD
- -23.28%
- 6M
- -25.27%
- 1Y
- -39.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVW
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PYPY vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | -23.28% | -30.17% | 41.86% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 4.84% | 11.71% | 12.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPY and IVVW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024 | 0.46 |
PYPY vs. IVVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PYPY
IVVW
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PYPY
IVVW
Basic Materials
PYPY
-
IVVW
Communication Services
PYPY
-
IVVW
Consumer Cyclical
PYPY
-
IVVW
Consumer Defensive
PYPY
-
IVVW
Energy
PYPY
-
IVVW
Healthcare
PYPY
-
IVVW
Industrials
PYPY
-
IVVW
Real Estate
PYPY
-
IVVW
Technology
PYPY
-
IVVW
Utilities
PYPY
-
IVVW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPY vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank
PYPY
IVVW
PYPY vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYPY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.61 | -0.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 3.47 | -4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | 19.13 | -20.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYPY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | 2.73 | -3.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 1.07 | -1.30 |
Drawdowns
PYPY vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than IVVW's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and IVVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.64% | -16.79% | -36.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.14% | -5.81% | -41.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.18% | -0.09% | -49.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -1.75% | -14.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.44% | 1.05% | +25.39% |
Volatility
PYPY vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison
Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 1.13%. This indicates that PYPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 1.13% | +6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.63% | 6.07% | +22.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.15% | 7.40% | +26.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.10% | 12.66% | +18.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.10% | 12.66% | +18.44% |
PYPY vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYPY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYPY vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison
PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 69.43%, more than IVVW's 19.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 19.70% | 18.55% | 13.72% | 0.00% |
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 69.43% | 64.68% | 48.65% | 5.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPY and IVVW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPY has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to IVVW (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPY dropped -53.64% vs IVVW's -16.79%.
On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 20.07% vs -39.20% for PYPY. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 20.07% return vs -39.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for PYPY.
PYPY has the higher dividend yield at 69.43%, compared with 19.70% for IVVW.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for PYPY and 0.25% for IVVW.
IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPY and IVVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer