PYPY vs. IVVW
PYPY (Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. PYPY is actively managed, while IVVW is passively managed. Over the past year, PYPY returned -35.68% vs 18.35% for IVVW. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYPY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.
Performance
PYPY vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPY achieves a -18.47% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 6.90% return.
PYPY
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 8.47%
- 6M
- -16.97%
- YTD
- -18.47%
- 1Y
- -35.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVW
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PYPY vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | -18.47% | -30.17% | 42.09% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 6.90% | 11.71% | 12.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPY and IVVW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024 | 0.45 |
PYPY vs. IVVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PYPY
IVVW
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PYPY
IVVW
Basic Materials
PYPY
-
IVVW
Communication Services
PYPY
-
IVVW
Consumer Cyclical
PYPY
-
IVVW
Consumer Defensive
PYPY
-
IVVW
Energy
PYPY
-
IVVW
Healthcare
PYPY
-
IVVW
Industrials
PYPY
-
IVVW
Real Estate
PYPY
-
IVVW
Technology
PYPY
-
IVVW
Utilities
PYPY
-
IVVW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPY vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank
PYPY
IVVW
PYPY vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYPY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.48 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 3.17 | -3.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 16.82 | -18.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYPY vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than IVVW's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and IVVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.64% | -16.79% | -36.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.14% | -5.81% | -41.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.99% | -0.02% | -45.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -1.70% | -15.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.76% | 1.09% | +28.67% |
Volatility
PYPY vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison
Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 2.66%. This indicates that PYPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 2.66% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.29% | 7.08% | +22.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.83% | 8.17% | +25.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 12.59% | +18.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 12.59% | +18.25% |
PYPY vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYPY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYPY vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison
PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.58%, more than IVVW's 19.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 19.04% | 18.55% | 13.72% | 0.00% |
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF | 65.58% | 64.68% | 48.65% | 5.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPY and IVVW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPY has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to IVVW (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPY dropped -53.64% vs IVVW's -16.79%.
On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 18.35% vs -35.68% for PYPY. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 18.35% return vs -35.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for PYPY.
PYPY has the higher dividend yield at 65.58%, compared with 19.04% for IVVW.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for PYPY and 0.25% for IVVW.
IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPY and IVVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer