PYPY vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PYPY (Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PYPY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PYPY returned -39.50% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYPY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

PYPY vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYPY achieves a -24.96% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.86% return.

PYPY

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -4.78%
• YTD: -24.96%
• 6M: -26.42%
• 1Y: -39.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYPY vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF	-24.96%	-30.17%	37.68%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.86%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PYPY and CSHP is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024	0.00

The correlation between PYPY and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PYPY vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYPY

PYPY Risk / Return Rank: 1
PYPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
PYPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PYPY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PYPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
PYPY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYPY vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PYPY	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	11.22	-12.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.53	28.31	-29.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	6.67	-5.90
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	65.84	-66.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	395.75	-397.16

PYPY vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYPY Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYPY and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PYPY vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYPY	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.64%	-0.08%	-53.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.14%	-0.06%	-47.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.29%	-0.01%	-50.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.73%	-0.00%	-16.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.04%	0.01%	+28.03%

Volatility

PYPY vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.15%. This indicates that PYPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYPY	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.99%	0.15%	+6.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.78%	0.27%	+28.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.94%	0.36%	+33.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.97%	0.41%	+30.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.97%	0.41%	+30.56%

PYPY vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYPY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYPY vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.46%, more than CSHP's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.91%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%
PYPY Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF	74.46%	64.68%	48.65%	5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYPY and CSHP in my portfolio?

PYPY and CSHP have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYPY or CSHP?

PYPY has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to CSHP (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPY dropped -53.64% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, PYPY or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs -39.50% for PYPY. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PYPY or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -39.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PYPY or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for PYPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PYPY or CSHP?

PYPY has the higher dividend yield at 74.46%, compared with 3.91% for CSHP.

What is the main difference between PYPY and CSHP?

PYPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for PYPY and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.22 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.