PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYPY vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYPY vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYPY achieves a -3.83% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.


PYPY

1D
2.06%
1M
24.39%
6M
-3.46%
YTD
-3.83%
1Y
-23.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
1.13%
1M
1.49%
6M
35.86%
YTD
24.48%
1Y
64.61%
3Y*
-31.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYPY vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PYPY
Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF
-3.83%-30.17%43.88%6.19%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
24.48%-1.76%-62.60%-38.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PYPY and BITI is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2023

-0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYPY vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYPY
PYPY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PYPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYPY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PYPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYPY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYPY vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYPYBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.25

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

2.57

-3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.78

6.38

-7.15

PYPY vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYPY Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYPY and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYPY vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYPYBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.64%

-92.16%

+38.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.14%

-25.28%

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.29%

-86.41%

+50.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.46%

-68.40%

+50.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.87%

10.16%

+19.71%

Volatility

PYPY vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) has a higher volatility of 15.75% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 10.76%. This indicates that PYPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYPYBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.75%

10.76%

+4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.80%

34.28%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.19%

44.15%

-6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.20%

52.24%

-20.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.20%

52.24%

-20.04%

PYPY vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYPY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYPY vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.82%, more than BITI's 15.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.62%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
PYPY
Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF
56.82%64.68%48.65%5.70%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYPY and BITI have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYPY has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to BITI (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPY dropped -53.64% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.61% vs -23.22% for PYPY. On fees, PYPY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.61% return vs -23.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PYPY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

PYPY has the higher dividend yield at 56.82%, compared with 15.62% for BITI.

PYPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for PYPY and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYPY and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer