PYPG vs. XTJL
PYPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PYPG returned -57.41% vs 12.73% for XTJL. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYPG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
PYPG vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPG achieves a -23.77% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.36% return.
PYPG
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 73.22%
- 6M
- -19.05%
- YTD
- -23.77%
- 1Y
- -57.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
PYPG vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | -23.77% | -20.19% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.36% | 22.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPG and XTJL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPG vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
PYPG
XTJL
PYPG vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PYPG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.37 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 2.50 | -3.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 14.09 | -15.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PYPG vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPG drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPG and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.52% | -23.24% | -56.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.52% | -5.12% | -74.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.90% | -0.99% | -60.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.38% | -3.95% | -37.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.44% | 0.91% | +55.53% |
Volatility
PYPG vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) has a higher volatility of 34.49% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 1.50%. This indicates that PYPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.49% | 1.50% | +32.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.02% | 5.76% | +71.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.36% | 7.43% | +77.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.15% | 15.10% | +68.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.15% | 15.05% | +68.10% |
PYPG vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYPG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYPG vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither PYPG nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPG and XTJL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPG has higher volatility (34.49%) compared to XTJL (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPG dropped -79.52% vs XTJL's -23.24%.
On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 12.73% vs -57.41% for PYPG. On fees, PYPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 1.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 12.73% return vs -57.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PYPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTJL.
PYPG and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PYPG and 0.79% for XTJL.
XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPG and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer