PYPG vs. RXD
PYPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF) and RXD (ProShares UltraShort Health Care) are both Leveraged Equities funds. PYPG is actively managed, while RXD is passively managed. Over the past year, PYPG returned -73.73% vs -18.26% for RXD. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. PYPG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RXD.
Performance
PYPG vs. RXD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYPG achieves a -54.66% return, which is significantly lower than RXD's 10.62% return.
PYPG
- 1D
- -8.80%
- 1M
- -29.99%
- YTD
- -54.66%
- 6M
- -59.27%
- 1Y
- -73.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RXD
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -3.74%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- -18.26%
- 3Y*
- -5.04%
- 5Y*
- -6.89%
- 10Y*
- -18.70%
PYPG vs. RXD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | -54.66% | -16.47% |
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | 10.62% | -24.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYPG and RXD is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYPG vs. RXD — Risk / Return Rank
PYPG
RXD
PYPG vs. RXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) and ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYPG | RXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.91 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.53 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | -0.83 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYPG | RXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.95 | -0.62 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.73 | -0.65 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
PYPG vs. RXD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYPG drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, smaller than the maximum RXD drawdown of -99.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPG and RXD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYPG | RXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.52% | -99.65% | +20.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.52% | -34.63% | -44.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.34% | -99.59% | +22.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.99% | -81.87% | +43.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.16% | 22.07% | +28.09% |
Volatility
PYPG vs. RXD - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) has a higher volatility of 19.74% compared to ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) at 8.42%. This indicates that PYPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYPG | RXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.74% | 8.42% | +11.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.28% | 21.06% | +47.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.89% | 29.48% | +48.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.51% | 29.74% | +48.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.51% | 32.96% | +45.55% |
PYPG vs. RXD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYPG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RXD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYPG vs. RXD - Dividend Comparison
PYPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | 2.53% | 3.29% | 4.36% | 3.17% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.73% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYPG and RXD have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYPG has higher volatility (19.74%) compared to RXD (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPG dropped -79.52% vs RXD's -99.65%.
On 1-year performance, RXD leads with -18.26% vs -73.73% for PYPG. On fees, PYPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RXD has been the lower-risk option at 8.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RXD has performed better with a -18.26% return vs -73.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PYPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RXD.
RXD has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.00% for PYPG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PYPG and 0.95% for RXD.
RXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYPG and RXD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer