PYPG vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PYPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PYPG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PYPG returned -72.85% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. PYPG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

PYPG vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYPG achieves a -55.53% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.86% return.

PYPG

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -9.60%
• YTD: -55.53%
• 6M: -57.84%
• 1Y: -72.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYPG vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF	-55.53%	-20.19%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.86%	3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PYPG and CSHP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

PYPG vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYPG

PYPG Risk / Return Rank: 1
PYPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PYPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PYPG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PYPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
PYPG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYPG vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PYPG	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.94	11.22	-12.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.49	28.31	-29.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	6.67	-5.88
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	65.84	-66.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.38	395.75	-397.13

PYPG vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYPG Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYPG and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PYPG vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYPG drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPG and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYPG	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.52%	-0.08%	-79.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.52%	-0.06%	-79.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.77%	-0.01%	-77.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.49%	-0.00%	-39.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.94%	0.01%	+52.93%

Volatility

PYPG vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF (PYPG) has a higher volatility of 17.67% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.15%. This indicates that PYPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYPG	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.67%	0.15%	+17.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	69.16%	0.27%	+68.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.77%	0.36%	+77.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.90%	0.41%	+77.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	77.90%	0.41%	+77.49%

PYPG vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYPG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYPG vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

PYPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.91%	5.39%	1.96%
PYPG Leverage Shares 2X Long PYPL Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYPG and CSHP in my portfolio?

PYPG and CSHP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYPG or CSHP?

PYPG has higher volatility (17.67%) compared to CSHP (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPG dropped -79.52% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, PYPG or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.96% vs -72.85% for PYPG. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PYPG or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.96% return vs -72.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PYPG or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PYPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PYPG or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for PYPG.

What is the main difference between PYPG and CSHP?

PYPG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PYPG and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.22 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.