PYLMX vs. TMPFX
PYLMX (Payden Limited Maturity Fund) and TMPFX (Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PYLMX returned 3.70%/yr vs 2.67%/yr for TMPFX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYLMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for TMPFX.
Performance
PYLMX vs. TMPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYLMX achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than TMPFX's 1.52% return.
PYLMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
TMPFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- —
PYLMX vs. TMPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYLMX Payden Limited Maturity Fund | 1.39% | 5.22% | 6.08% | 5.34% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 1.85% | 3.34% | 1.66% |
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund | 1.52% | 3.71% | 4.26% | 3.90% | 0.51% | -0.91% | -0.60% | 0.30% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PYLMX and TMPFX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2018 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PYLMX vs. TMPFX — Risk / Return Rank
PYLMX
TMPFX
PYLMX vs. TMPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYLMX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.49 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.00 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYLMX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 6.81 | -3.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.74 | 1.15 | +1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 0.81 | +1.58 |
Drawdowns
PYLMX vs. TMPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYLMX drawdown since its inception was -5.56%, which is greater than TMPFX's maximum drawdown of -3.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLMX and TMPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYLMX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -3.52% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.52% | 0.00% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.52% | -3.52% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.24% | -3.52% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.65% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.12% | 0.00% | +0.12% |
Volatility
PYLMX vs. TMPFX - Volatility Comparison
Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) at 0.16%. This indicates that PYLMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PYLMX | TMPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 0.16% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.09% | 0.39% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56% | 0.56% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.36% | 2.33% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.31% | 1.81% | -0.50% |
PYLMX vs. TMPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYLMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TMPFX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
PYLMX vs. TMPFX - Dividend Comparison
PYLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than TMPFX's 3.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYLMX Payden Limited Maturity Fund | 4.51% | 4.96% | 5.36% | 3.79% | 1.83% | 0.50% | 1.39% | 2.54% | 2.28% | 1.42% | 0.91% | 0.73% |
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund | 3.75% | 3.81% | 4.15% | 3.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PYLMX and TMPFX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PYLMX has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to TMPFX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLMX dropped -5.56% vs TMPFX's -3.52%.
TMPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.81 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PYLMX and TMPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer