PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYLMX vs. PYGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYLMX vs. PYGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYLMX achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than PYGSX's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PYLMX has outperformed PYGSX with an annualized return of 2.77%, while PYGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.


PYLMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.79%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
2.77%

PYGSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYLMX vs. PYGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYLMX
Payden Limited Maturity Fund
1.39%5.22%6.08%5.34%0.56%0.19%1.85%3.34%1.76%1.64%
PYGSX
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
0.64%5.72%5.19%5.61%-3.38%0.17%3.14%4.77%0.58%1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PYLMX and PYGSX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.31

Over the past year, PYLMX and PYGSX have become more correlated (0.55) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYLMX vs. PYGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLMX
PYLMX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PYLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PYGSX
PYGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PYGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PYGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYLMX vs. PYGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYLMXPYGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.49

1.63

+0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.87

3.32

+5.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.00

13.07

+24.92

PYLMX vs. PYGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYLMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the PYGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLMX and PYGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYLMXPYGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

2.66

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.74

1.38

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.13

1.41

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.39

2.08

+0.31

Drawdowns

PYLMX vs. PYGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLMX drawdown since its inception was -5.56%, smaller than the maximum PYGSX drawdown of -7.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLMX and PYGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYLMXPYGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-7.29%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.52%

-1.23%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.52%

-1.23%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.24%

-5.38%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.56%

-7.29%

+1.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.49%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

0.31%

-0.19%

Volatility

PYLMX vs. PYGSX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX) have volatilities of 0.48% and 0.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYLMXPYGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

0.48%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.09%

1.11%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56%

1.53%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.36%

1.88%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.31%

1.75%

-0.44%

PYLMX vs. PYGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PYGSX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYLMX vs. PYGSX - Dividend Comparison

PYLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than PYGSX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYGSX
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
4.65%4.63%4.64%3.84%2.14%1.68%1.78%2.74%2.51%1.68%1.19%1.20%
PYLMX
Payden Limited Maturity Fund
4.51%4.96%5.36%3.79%1.83%0.50%1.39%2.54%2.28%1.42%0.91%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYLMX and PYGSX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYGSX has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to PYLMX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLMX dropped -5.56% vs PYGSX's -7.29%.

PYLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYLMX and PYGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer