PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYLMX vs. BUBSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYLMX vs. BUBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PYLMX having a 1.39% return and BUBSX slightly higher at 1.41%. Over the past 10 years, PYLMX has outperformed BUBSX with an annualized return of 2.77%, while BUBSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.51% annualized return.


PYLMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.79%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
2.77%

BUBSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
2.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYLMX vs. BUBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYLMX
Payden Limited Maturity Fund
1.39%5.22%6.08%5.34%0.56%0.19%1.85%3.34%1.76%1.64%
BUBSX
Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund
1.41%4.53%5.47%5.43%0.70%-0.05%1.66%2.87%1.61%1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PYLMX and BUBSX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2014

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYLMX vs. BUBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLMX
PYLMX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PYLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BUBSX
BUBSX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BUBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BUBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYLMX vs. BUBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYLMXBUBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-14.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.49

12.11

-9.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.87

41.98

-33.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.00

305.78

-267.79

PYLMX vs. BUBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYLMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is lower than the BUBSX Sharpe Ratio of 6.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLMX and BUBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYLMXBUBSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

6.62

-3.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.74

4.56

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.13

3.59

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.39

3.16

-0.76

Drawdowns

PYLMX vs. BUBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLMX drawdown since its inception was -5.56%, which is greater than BUBSX's maximum drawdown of -1.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLMX and BUBSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYLMXBUBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-1.88%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.52%

-0.10%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.52%

-0.29%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.24%

-0.83%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.56%

-1.88%

-3.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-0.07%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

0.01%

+0.11%

Volatility

PYLMX vs. BUBSX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Limited Maturity Fund (PYLMX) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund (BUBSX) at 0.16%. This indicates that PYLMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYLMXBUBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

0.16%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.09%

0.43%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56%

0.62%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.36%

0.76%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.31%

0.70%

+0.61%

PYLMX vs. BUBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BUBSX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYLMX vs. BUBSX - Dividend Comparison

PYLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than BUBSX's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUBSX
Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund
4.04%4.24%5.04%4.39%1.29%0.25%1.14%2.33%1.90%1.04%0.81%0.56%
PYLMX
Payden Limited Maturity Fund
4.51%4.96%5.36%3.79%1.83%0.50%1.39%2.54%2.28%1.42%0.91%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYLMX and BUBSX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYLMX has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to BUBSX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLMX dropped -5.56% vs BUBSX's -1.88%.

BUBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.62 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYLMX and BUBSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer