PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYLD vs. OOSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYLD vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYLD achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than OOSP's 2.41% return.


PYLD

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.31%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OOSP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.91%
YTD
2.41%
6M
2.51%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYLD vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PYLD and OOSP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYLD vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

OOSP
OOSP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
OOSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
OOSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOSP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYLD vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYLDOOSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.38

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

5.13

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.44

19.01

-8.57

PYLD vs. OOSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the OOSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYLD and OOSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYLDOOSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.82

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.04

2.29

-0.24

Drawdowns

PYLD vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYLD drawdown since its inception was -4.52%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYLD and OOSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYLDOOSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-1.31%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-1.31%

-1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.18%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-0.20%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.35%

+0.36%

Volatility

PYLD vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP) have volatilities of 1.24% and 1.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYLDOOSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

1.23%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

2.23%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

3.71%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.99%

3.35%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.99%

3.35%

+0.64%

PYLD vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYLD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYLD vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison

PYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than OOSP's 6.47% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PYLD and OOSP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYLD has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to OOSP (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYLD dropped -4.52% vs OOSP's -1.31%.

On 1-year performance, PYLD leads with 7.40% vs 6.71% for OOSP. On fees, PYLD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PYLD has performed better with a 7.40% return vs 6.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PYLD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.

OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 6.30% for PYLD.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PYLD and 0.90% for OOSP.

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYLD and OOSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer