PYHRX vs. XILSX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX).

PYHRX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Dec 30, 1997. XILSX is managed by Amundi. It was launched on Dec 16, 2014.

Performance

PYHRX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PYHRX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	0.06%	8.73%	8.13%	14.73%	-9.76%	6.62%	7.38%	16.75%	-2.85%	5.62%
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund	6.00%	18.70%	18.93%	18.65%	1.23%	-1.10%	7.37%	2.60%	-2.11%	-8.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYHRX achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than XILSX's 6.00% return.

PYHRX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -0.95%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 6M: 1.79%
• 1Y: 7.93%
• 3Y*: 9.23%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 6.16%

XILSX

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 6.00%
• 6M: 12.03%
• 1Y: 26.11%
• 3Y*: 19.87%
• 5Y*: 12.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYHRX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYHRX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.

XILSX

Pioneer ILS Interval Fund

PYHRX

Payden High Income Fund

Return for Risk

PYHRX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYHRX

PYHRX Risk / Return Rank: 32
PYHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PYHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
PYHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
PYHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PYHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

XILSX

XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYHRX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYHRX	XILSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.07	8.44	-8.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	73.85	-72.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.93	32.11	-30.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	124.30	-124.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.45	774.78	-772.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYHRX vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYHRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 8.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYHRX and XILSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYHRX	XILSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07	8.44	-8.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	3.23	-3.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	1.60	-1.34

Correlation

The correlation between PYHRX and XILSX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

PYHRX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

PYHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, less than XILSX's 8.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	6.55%	6.81%	7.20%	6.67%	6.05%	4.79%	4.99%	5.23%	5.88%	5.27%	5.24%	5.49%
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund	8.97%	9.51%	13.06%	12.82%	2.68%	2.04%	5.20%	6.63%	6.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PYHRX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYHRX drawdown since its inception was -50.79%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYHRX and XILSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYHRX	XILSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.79%	-14.53%	-36.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.27%	-0.21%	-50.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.79%	-6.27%	-44.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.18%	0.00%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-5.00%	+2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	0.03%	+3.21%

Volatility

PYHRX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 1.02%. This indicates that PYHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYHRX	XILSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	1.02%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.86%	2.28%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	113.65%	3.11%	+110.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.05%	3.77%	+47.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.28%	3.96%	+32.32%