PYGNX vs. PYHRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PYGNX (Payden GNMA Fund) and PYHRX (Payden High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - PYGNX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Paydenfunds, while PYHRX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Paydenfunds. Over the past 10 years, PYGNX returned 0.75%/yr vs 6.13%/yr for PYHRX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PYGNX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PYHRX.

Performance

PYGNX vs. PYHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX) and Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYGNX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than PYHRX's 2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, PYGNX has underperformed PYHRX with an annualized return of 0.75%, while PYHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.13% annualized return.

PYGNX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 6M: 0.79%
• 1Y: 5.64%
• 3Y*: 3.73%
• 5Y*: -0.36%
• 10Y*: 0.75%

PYHRX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.20%
• 6M: 2.94%
• 1Y: 8.60%
• 3Y*: 9.57%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 6.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYGNX vs. PYHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYGNX Payden GNMA Fund	0.60%	7.54%	0.84%	3.93%	-12.54%	-2.26%	4.27%	5.67%	0.37%	1.33%
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	2.20%	8.73%	8.13%	14.73%	-9.76%	6.62%	7.38%	16.75%	-2.85%	6.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PYGNX and PYHRX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 1999	0.15

Over the past year, PYGNX and PYHRX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PYGNX vs. PYHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYGNX

PYGNX Risk / Return Rank: 28
PYGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PYGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
PYGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PYGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
PYGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

PYHRX

PYHRX Risk / Return Rank: 95
PYHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PYHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PYHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
PYHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PYHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYGNX vs. PYHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX) and Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYGNX	PYHRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	3.61	-2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	5.67	-3.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.85	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	4.39	-2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.14	23.69	-17.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYGNX vs. PYHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYGNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the PYHRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYGNX and PYHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYGNX	PYHRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	3.61	-2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	0.10	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.17	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.26	+0.60

Drawdowns

PYGNX vs. PYHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYGNX drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum PYHRX drawdown of -50.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYGNX and PYHRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYGNX	PYHRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.64%	-50.79%	+31.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.40%	-2.02%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.09%	-50.79%	+42.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.72%	-50.79%	+32.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.64%	-50.79%	+31.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-0.16%	-3.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-2.12%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	0.37%	+0.66%

Volatility

PYGNX vs. PYHRX - Volatility Comparison

Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to Payden High Income Fund (PYHRX) at 0.75%. This indicates that PYGNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYGNX	PYHRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.68%	0.75%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.20%	1.97%	+1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.36%	2.47%	+1.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.42%	51.06%	-44.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.87%	36.28%	-31.41%

PYGNX vs. PYHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYGNX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PYHRX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYGNX vs. PYHRX - Dividend Comparison

PYGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than PYHRX's 6.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PYGNX Payden GNMA Fund	3.93%	3.80%	3.63%	2.64%	3.70%	2.74%	2.80%	3.34%	3.26%	3.24%	3.07%	3.59%
PYHRX Payden High Income Fund	6.43%	6.81%	7.20%	6.67%	6.05%	4.79%	4.99%	5.23%	5.88%	5.27%	5.24%	5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYGNX and PYHRX in my portfolio?

PYGNX and PYHRX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYGNX or PYHRX?

PYGNX has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to PYHRX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYGNX dropped -19.64% vs PYHRX's -50.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.