PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYFRX vs. PYGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYFRX vs. PYGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYFRX achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than PYGSX's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PYFRX has outperformed PYGSX with an annualized return of 5.08%, while PYGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.


PYFRX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.90%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
8.09%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*
5.08%

PYGSX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.75%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.61%
10Y*
2.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYFRX vs. PYGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
1.73%6.61%8.90%12.86%0.27%3.93%1.72%8.49%0.31%2.82%
PYGSX
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
0.54%5.72%5.19%5.61%-3.38%0.17%3.14%4.77%0.58%1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PYFRX and PYGSX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYFRX vs. PYGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYFRX
PYFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PYFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PYFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PYGSX
PYGSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PYGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PYGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYFRX vs. PYGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYFRXPYGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.83

1.53

+1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.58

2.88

+3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.60

10.94

+16.67

PYFRX vs. PYGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYFRX Sharpe Ratio is 5.15, which is higher than the PYGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYFRX and PYGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYFRX vs. PYGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYFRX drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, which is greater than PYGSX's maximum drawdown of -7.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYFRX and PYGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYFRXPYGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.18%

-7.29%

-12.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.97%

-1.23%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-1.23%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.80%

-5.38%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.18%

-7.29%

-12.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.46%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-0.49%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.32%

-0.09%

Volatility

PYFRX vs. PYGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) is 0.30%, while Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX) has a volatility of 0.57%. This indicates that PYFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYFRXPYGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

0.57%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.04%

1.18%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24%

1.56%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.95%

1.90%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

1.75%

+1.87%

PYFRX vs. PYGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PYGSX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYFRX vs. PYGSX - Dividend Comparison

PYFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.03%, more than PYGSX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
7.03%7.55%8.88%8.35%5.08%2.94%3.19%4.45%4.22%3.30%3.53%3.17%
PYGSX
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
4.65%4.63%4.64%3.84%2.14%1.68%1.78%2.74%2.51%1.68%1.19%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYFRX and PYGSX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYGSX has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to PYFRX (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYFRX dropped -20.18% vs PYGSX's -7.29%.

PYFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.15 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYFRX and PYGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer