PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYFRX vs. DDFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYFRX vs. DDFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYFRX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than DDFLX's 1.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PYFRX has underperformed DDFLX with an annualized return of 5.07%, while DDFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.36% annualized return.


PYFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.80%
1Y
5.89%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
5.07%

DDFLX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.50%
6M
2.07%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYFRX vs. DDFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
1.62%6.61%8.90%12.86%0.27%3.93%1.72%8.49%0.31%2.82%
DDFLX
Delaware Floating Rate Fund
1.50%6.01%8.92%10.75%-0.62%5.46%3.17%10.69%1.26%4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PYFRX and DDFLX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.47

The correlation between PYFRX and DDFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYFRX vs. DDFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYFRX
PYFRX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PYFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PYFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

DDFLX
DDFLX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DDFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DDFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYFRX vs. DDFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) and Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYFRXDDFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.69

2.03

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.23

5.14

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.14

18.58

+7.56

PYFRX vs. DDFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYFRX Sharpe Ratio is 4.87, which is higher than the DDFLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYFRX and DDFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYFRX vs. DDFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYFRX drawdown since its inception was -20.18%, which is greater than DDFLX's maximum drawdown of -18.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYFRX and DDFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYFRXDDFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.18%

-18.09%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.97%

-1.11%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.66%

-2.05%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.80%

-5.18%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.18%

-18.09%

-2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.38%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.58%

-0.67%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.31%

-0.08%

Volatility

PYFRX vs. DDFLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Floating Rate Fund (PYFRX) is 0.32%, while Delaware Floating Rate Fund (DDFLX) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that PYFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYFRXDDFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

0.68%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.04%

1.64%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24%

2.27%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.95%

2.71%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.62%

3.50%

+0.12%

PYFRX vs. DDFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYFRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DDFLX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYFRX vs. DDFLX - Dividend Comparison

PYFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than DDFLX's 6.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDFLX
Delaware Floating Rate Fund
6.81%7.21%8.62%7.17%5.04%3.96%4.89%6.54%5.73%4.33%2.09%2.34%
PYFRX
Payden Floating Rate Fund
7.04%7.55%8.88%8.35%5.08%2.94%3.19%4.45%4.22%3.30%3.53%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYFRX and DDFLX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDFLX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to PYFRX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYFRX dropped -20.18% vs DDFLX's -18.09%.

PYFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.87 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYFRX and DDFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer