PYELX vs. DBELX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PYELX (Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund) and DBELX (DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, PYELX returned 1.97%/yr vs 2.99%/yr for DBELX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PYELX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for DBELX.

Performance

PYELX vs. DBELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYELX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than DBELX's 2.50% return.

PYELX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: 1.20%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 11.47%
• 3Y*: 7.70%
• 5Y*: 1.97%
• 10Y*: 2.96%

DBELX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 2.50%
• 6M: 3.44%
• 1Y: 13.11%
• 3Y*: 8.35%
• 5Y*: 2.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYELX vs. DBELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund	1.20%	19.79%	-3.48%	13.16%	-11.28%	-7.83%	1.79%	3.90%
DBELX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	2.50%	20.86%	-4.37%	12.50%	-6.99%	-9.37%	2.61%	0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PYELX and DBELX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019	0.93

The correlation between PYELX and DBELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PYELX vs. DBELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYELX

PYELX Risk / Return Rank: 30
PYELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PYELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PYELX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
PYELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
PYELX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

DBELX

DBELX Risk / Return Rank: 35
DBELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
DBELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
DBELX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
DBELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DBELX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYELX vs. DBELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PYELX	DBELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.81	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.55	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.36	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	1.89	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.28	6.94	-1.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PYELX vs. DBELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the DBELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYELX and DBELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PYELX	DBELX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	1.81	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.42	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.30	-0.26

Drawdowns

PYELX vs. DBELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYELX drawdown since its inception was -56.98%, which is greater than DBELX's maximum drawdown of -21.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYELX and DBELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYELX	DBELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.98%	-21.95%	-35.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-6.89%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.49%	-8.54%	-41.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.98%	-19.87%	-32.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.59%	-1.70%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.80%	-7.21%	-9.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	1.88%	+0.25%

Volatility

PYELX vs. DBELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund (PYELX) is 2.13%, while DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that PYELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYELX	DBELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.13%	2.34%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.60%	6.32%	-0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.52%	7.23%	-0.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.60%	7.13%	+43.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.37%	7.45%	+28.92%

PYELX vs. DBELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYELX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBELX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYELX vs. DBELX - Dividend Comparison

PYELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than DBELX's 4.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBELX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	4.92%	4.41%	3.80%	2.03%	2.01%	1.98%	1.17%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PYELX Payden Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund	7.19%	7.32%	7.08%	5.38%	5.93%	5.36%	4.69%	5.46%	6.67%	6.15%	5.44%	5.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYELX and DBELX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, PYELX and DBELX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PYELX or DBELX?

DBELX has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to PYELX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYELX dropped -56.98% vs DBELX's -21.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.