PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBELX vs. ELD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBELX vs. ELD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBELX achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than ELD's 0.74% return.


DBELX

1D
0.31%
1M
1.67%
YTD
2.50%
6M
3.44%
1Y
13.11%
3Y*
8.35%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*

ELD

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.61%
YTD
0.74%
6M
1.87%
1Y
10.72%
3Y*
7.80%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBELX vs. ELD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBELX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
2.50%20.86%-4.37%12.50%-6.99%-9.37%2.61%0.89%
ELD
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund
0.74%21.77%-4.56%14.29%-9.25%-9.75%1.79%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DBELX and ELD is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.73

The correlation between DBELX and ELD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBELX vs. ELD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBELX
DBELX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DBELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBELX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DBELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBELX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ELD
ELD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ELD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ELD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBELX vs. ELD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBELXELDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.51

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.94

5.31

+1.63

DBELX vs. ELD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBELX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the ELD Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBELX and ELD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBELXELDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.27

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.21

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.12

+0.17

Drawdowns

DBELX vs. ELD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBELX drawdown since its inception was -21.95%, smaller than the maximum ELD drawdown of -31.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBELX and ELD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBELXELDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.95%

-31.92%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-7.15%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.54%

-10.89%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-23.56%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-2.75%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-13.31%

+6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.02%

-0.14%

Volatility

DBELX vs. ELD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (DBELX) is 2.34%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund (ELD) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that DBELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBELXELDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

2.73%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.32%

7.12%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23%

8.52%

-1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

10.93%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.45%

11.27%

-3.82%

DBELX vs. ELD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBELX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ELD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBELX vs. ELD - Dividend Comparison

DBELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than ELD's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBELX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
4.92%4.41%3.80%2.03%2.01%1.98%1.17%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ELD
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund
5.82%5.38%5.75%4.85%5.29%4.98%4.70%4.92%6.30%4.68%4.86%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBELX and ELD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELD has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to DBELX (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBELX dropped -21.95% vs ELD's -31.92%.

DBELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBELX and ELD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer