PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYCEX vs. PYSBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYCEX achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than PYSBX's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PYCEX has outperformed PYSBX with an annualized return of 4.20%, while PYSBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


PYCEX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.79%
1Y
7.98%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
4.20%

PYSBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.63%
6M
1.10%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
4.79%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYCEX
Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
1.98%7.96%7.90%7.37%-11.02%0.80%8.17%11.90%-3.33%9.13%
PYSBX
Payden Low Duration Fund
0.63%5.72%5.03%4.96%-3.40%-0.23%3.46%3.92%1.00%1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PYCEX and PYSBX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.32

The correlation between PYCEX and PYSBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYCEX vs. PYSBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYCEX
PYCEX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PYCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PYCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PYSBX
PYSBX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PYSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PYSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYCEXPYSBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.94

1.99

+1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.46

3.84

+2.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.06

1.48

+0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.14

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.95

11.34

+3.61

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYCEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.94, which is higher than the PYSBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYCEX and PYSBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYCEXPYSBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94

1.99

+1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

1.14

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.55

+0.69

Drawdowns

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYCEX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, which is greater than PYSBX's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYCEX and PYSBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYCEXPYSBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.12%

-6.65%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.37%

-1.41%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.15%

-1.41%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.12%

-5.46%

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.12%

-6.65%

-13.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.28%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-0.53%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.39%

+0.15%

Volatility

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX) have volatilities of 0.64% and 0.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYCEXPYSBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.61%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

1.51%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04%

1.98%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.23%

2.13%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.58%

1.90%

+1.68%

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYCEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PYSBX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Dividend Comparison

PYCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than PYSBX's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYCEX
Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
6.33%6.50%6.21%5.59%4.92%5.23%4.00%4.81%5.13%4.84%4.18%4.51%
PYSBX
Payden Low Duration Fund
4.39%4.32%4.27%2.93%1.87%1.06%2.50%2.14%2.30%1.57%1.24%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYCEX and PYSBX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYCEX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to PYSBX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYCEX dropped -20.12% vs PYSBX's -6.65%.

PYCEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYCEX and PYSBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer