PYCEX vs. PYSBX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PYCEX (Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund) and PYSBX (Payden Low Duration Fund) are both mutual funds - PYCEX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Paydenfunds, while PYSBX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Paydenfunds. Over the past 10 years, PYCEX returned 3.87%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for PYSBX. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PYCEX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for PYSBX.

Performance

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYCEX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly higher than PYSBX's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PYCEX has outperformed PYSBX with an annualized return of 3.87%, while PYSBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.

PYCEX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 1Y: 5.45%
• 3Y*: 7.46%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: 3.87%
• ALL TIME*: 4.13%

PYSBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.31%
• 6M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.49%
• 1Y: 2.52%
• 3Y*: 4.61%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: 2.21%
• ALL TIME*: 4.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PYSBX Payden Low Duration Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	1.90%	7.96%	7.90%	7.37%	-11.02%	0.80%	8.17%	11.90%	-3.33%	9.13%
PYSBX Payden Low Duration Fund	0.49%	5.72%	5.03%	4.96%	-3.40%	-0.23%	3.46%	3.92%	1.00%	1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PYCEX and PYSBX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.32

The correlation between PYCEX and PYSBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PYCEX vs. PYSBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PYCEX

PYCEX Risk / Return Rank: 87
PYCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PYCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PYCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PYCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
PYCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

PYSBX

PYSBX Risk / Return Rank: 64
PYSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
PYSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PYSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PYSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PYSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PYCEX	PYSBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	1.55	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.30	2.87	+1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.37	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	2.16	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.06	7.26	+2.79

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYCEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the PYSBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYCEX and PYSBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYCEX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, which is greater than PYSBX's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYCEX and PYSBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYCEX	PYSBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.12%	-6.65%	-13.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.37%	-1.41%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.15%	-1.41%	-1.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.12%	-5.46%	-14.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.12%	-6.65%	-13.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	-0.41%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.96%	-0.53%	-2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	0.42%	+0.13%

Volatility

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Volatility Comparison

Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) has a higher volatility of 0.48% compared to Payden Low Duration Fund (PYSBX) at 0.39%. This indicates that PYCEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYCEX	PYSBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.48%	0.39%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.63%	1.58%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05%	2.00%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.24%	2.16%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.57%	1.91%	+1.66%

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYCEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PYSBX's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYCEX vs. PYSBX - Dividend Comparison

PYCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than PYSBX's 4.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	6.44%	6.50%	6.21%	5.59%	4.92%	5.23%	4.00%	4.81%	5.13%	4.84%	4.18%	4.51%
PYSBX Payden Low Duration Fund	4.06%	4.32%	4.27%	2.93%	1.87%	1.06%	2.50%	2.14%	2.30%	1.57%	1.24%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYCEX and PYSBX in my portfolio?

PYCEX and PYSBX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYCEX or PYSBX?

PYCEX has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to PYSBX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYCEX dropped -20.12% vs PYSBX's -6.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYCEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.