PYCEX vs. PYCRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund (PYCRX).
PYCEX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 10, 2013. PYCRX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
PYCEX vs. PYCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PYCEX vs. PYCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | -0.54% | 7.96% | 7.90% | 7.37% | -11.02% | 0.80% | 8.17% | 11.90% | -3.33% | 9.13% |
PYCRX Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund | -0.26% | 6.37% | 2.57% | 6.16% | -6.38% | 0.76% | 5.58% | 8.21% | 0.57% | 6.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYCEX achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than PYCRX's -0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PYCEX has outperformed PYCRX with an annualized return of 4.20%, while PYCRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.68% annualized return.
PYCEX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.20%
PYCRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PYCEX vs. PYCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYCEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PYCRX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PYCEX vs. PYCRX — Risk / Return Rank
PYCEX
PYCRX
PYCEX vs. PYCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund (PYCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYCEX | PYCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 1.10 | +0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 1.46 | +1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.33 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.42 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 5.07 | +1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYCEX | PYCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.10 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.59 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.18 | 0.83 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between PYCEX and PYCRX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PYCEX vs. PYCRX - Dividend Comparison
PYCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than PYCRX's 3.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 6.43% | 6.50% | 6.21% | 5.59% | 4.92% | 5.23% | 4.00% | 4.81% | 5.13% | 4.84% | 4.18% | 4.51% |
PYCRX Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund | 3.47% | 4.58% | 4.06% | 2.78% | 1.82% | 1.23% | 3.72% | 4.89% | 2.43% | 2.28% | 3.47% | 3.34% |
Drawdowns
PYCEX vs. PYCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYCEX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, which is greater than PYCRX's maximum drawdown of -10.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYCEX and PYCRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYCEX | PYCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -10.80% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -3.83% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.12% | -10.80% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.12% | -10.80% | -9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -2.55% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -1.42% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 1.08% | -0.36% |
Volatility
PYCEX vs. PYCRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) is 0.84%, while Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund (PYCRX) has a volatility of 0.97%. This indicates that PYCEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PYCEX | PYCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 0.97% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.42% | 1.65% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59% | 4.29% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 3.28% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.57% | 3.23% | +0.34% |