PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYCRX vs. PYGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYCRX vs. PYGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund (PYCRX) and Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYCRX achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly higher than PYGSX's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PYCRX has outperformed PYGSX with an annualized return of 2.77%, while PYGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.


PYCRX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.28%
6M
1.68%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
2.77%

PYGSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYCRX vs. PYGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYCRX
Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund
1.28%6.37%2.57%6.16%-6.38%0.76%5.58%8.21%0.57%6.04%
PYGSX
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
0.64%5.72%5.19%5.61%-3.38%0.17%3.14%4.77%0.58%1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PYCRX and PYGSX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.37

The correlation between PYCRX and PYGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYCRX vs. PYGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYCRX
PYCRX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PYCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PYCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PYGSX
PYGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PYGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PYGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYCRX vs. PYGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund (PYCRX) and Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYCRXPYGSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.63

2.66

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.10

4.31

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.63

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.32

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.89

13.07

-6.19

PYCRX vs. PYGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYCRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the PYGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYCRX and PYGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYCRXPYGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.66

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

1.38

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

1.41

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

2.08

-0.87

Drawdowns

PYCRX vs. PYGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYCRX drawdown since its inception was -10.80%, which is greater than PYGSX's maximum drawdown of -7.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYCRX and PYGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYCRXPYGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.80%

-7.29%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-1.23%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.06%

-1.23%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.80%

-5.38%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.80%

-7.29%

-3.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.35%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-0.49%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.31%

+0.63%

Volatility

PYCRX vs. PYGSX - Volatility Comparison

Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund (PYCRX) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to Payden Global Low Duration Fund (PYGSX) at 0.48%. This indicates that PYCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYCRXPYGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.48%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

1.11%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

1.53%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.32%

1.88%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.25%

1.75%

+1.50%

PYCRX vs. PYGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYCRX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PYGSX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYCRX vs. PYGSX - Dividend Comparison

PYCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than PYGSX's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYCRX
Payden California Municipal Social Impact Fund
3.41%4.58%4.06%2.78%1.82%1.23%3.72%4.89%2.43%2.28%3.47%3.34%
PYGSX
Payden Global Low Duration Fund
4.65%4.63%4.64%3.84%2.14%1.68%1.78%2.74%2.51%1.68%1.19%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYCRX and PYGSX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYCRX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to PYGSX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYCRX dropped -10.80% vs PYGSX's -7.29%.

PYGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYCRX and PYGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer