PYCEX vs. DLENX
Compare and contrast key facts about Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX).
PYCEX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 10, 2013. DLENX is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010.
Performance
PYCEX vs. DLENX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PYCEX vs. DLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | -0.54% | 7.96% | 7.90% | 7.37% | -11.02% | 0.80% | 8.17% | 11.90% | -3.33% | 9.13% |
DLENX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N | -1.36% | 8.11% | 7.92% | 9.36% | -15.50% | 1.71% | 4.66% | 11.71% | -3.54% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PYCEX achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly higher than DLENX's -1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PYCEX has outperformed DLENX with an annualized return of 4.20%, while DLENX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.75% annualized return.
PYCEX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.20%
DLENX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- -1.25%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PYCEX vs. DLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PYCEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DLENX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PYCEX vs. DLENX — Risk / Return Rank
PYCEX
DLENX
PYCEX vs. DLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PYCEX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 1.54 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 1.94 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.37 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.40 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 5.96 | +1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PYCEX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.54 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.33 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.18 | 0.81 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.92 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between PYCEX and DLENX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PYCEX vs. DLENX - Dividend Comparison
PYCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than DLENX's 4.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 6.43% | 6.50% | 6.21% | 5.59% | 4.92% | 5.23% | 4.00% | 4.81% | 5.13% | 4.84% | 4.18% | 4.51% |
DLENX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N | 4.90% | 5.33% | 5.71% | 5.29% | 4.49% | 3.74% | 4.11% | 4.49% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 4.29% | 4.94% |
Drawdowns
PYCEX vs. DLENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PYCEX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, smaller than the maximum DLENX drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYCEX and DLENX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PYCEX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -25.64% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -2.77% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.12% | -25.64% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.12% | -25.64% | +5.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -2.16% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -3.65% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.65% | +0.07% |
Volatility
PYCEX vs. DLENX - Volatility Comparison
Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) at 0.67%. This indicates that PYCEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PYCEX | DLENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 0.67% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.42% | 1.39% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59% | 2.61% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 4.57% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.57% | 4.66% | -1.09% |