PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYCEX vs. DLENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYCEX vs. DLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYCEX achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than DLENX's 1.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PYCEX has outperformed DLENX with an annualized return of 4.20%, while DLENX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.62% annualized return.


PYCEX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.56%
1Y
7.98%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
2.59%
10Y*
4.20%

DLENX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.61%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
3.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYCEX vs. DLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PYCEX
Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
1.98%7.96%7.90%7.37%-11.02%0.80%8.17%11.90%-3.33%9.13%
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
1.27%8.11%7.92%9.36%-15.50%1.71%4.66%11.71%-3.54%8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PYCEX and DLENX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.70

The correlation between PYCEX and DLENX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYCEX vs. DLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYCEX
PYCEX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PYCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PYCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DLENX
DLENX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYCEX vs. DLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PYCEXDLENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.06

1.80

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.56

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.75

14.16

+0.59

PYCEX vs. DLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYCEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.94, which is comparable to the DLENX Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYCEX and DLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PYCEXDLENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94

3.39

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.42

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.18

0.78

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.95

+0.28

Drawdowns

PYCEX vs. DLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYCEX drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, smaller than the maximum DLENX drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYCEX and DLENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYCEXDLENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.12%

-25.64%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.37%

-1.83%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.15%

-4.58%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.12%

-25.64%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.12%

-25.64%

+5.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-3.61%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.46%

+0.08%

Volatility

PYCEX vs. DLENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) is 0.64%, while DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that PYCEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYCEXDLENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.68%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

1.43%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03%

1.92%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.23%

4.55%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.58%

4.65%

-1.07%

PYCEX vs. DLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYCEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DLENX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYCEX vs. DLENX - Dividend Comparison

PYCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than DLENX's 5.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
5.31%5.33%5.71%5.29%4.49%3.74%4.11%4.49%3.57%4.07%4.29%4.94%
PYCEX
Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
6.33%6.50%6.21%5.59%4.92%5.23%4.00%4.81%5.13%4.84%4.18%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYCEX and DLENX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DLENX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to PYCEX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYCEX dropped -20.12% vs DLENX's -25.64%.

PYCEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 3.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYCEX and DLENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer