PY vs. YLD
PY (Principal Value ETF) and YLD (Principal Active High Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while YLD is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Principal. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PY returned 10.73%/yr vs 5.80%/yr for YLD. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for YLD.
Performance
PY vs. YLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than YLD's 2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PY has outperformed YLD with an annualized return of 10.73%, while YLD has yielded a comparatively lower 5.80% annualized return.
PY
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- 1Y
- 14.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
YLD
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- 7.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- 5.80%
PY vs. YLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 4.14% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 9.11% | -5.10% | 34.83% | 2.71% | 26.87% | -13.34% | 18.87% |
YLD Principal Active High Yield ETF | 2.83% | 6.55% | 9.19% | 12.93% | -8.78% | 9.17% | 1.50% | 13.58% | -3.30% | 9.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between PY and YLD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.39 |
The correlation between PY and YLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PY vs. YLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PY
YLD
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Technology
PY
YLD
-
Financial Services
PY
YLD
-
Healthcare
PY
YLD
-
Consumer Defensive
PY
YLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
PY
YLD
-
Industrials
PY
YLD
-
Energy
PY
YLD
-
Communication Services
PY
YLD
-
Utilities
PY
YLD
-
Basic Materials
PY
YLD
-
Real Estate
PY
YLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PY vs. YLD — Risk / Return Rank
PY
YLD
PY vs. YLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PY | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.74 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.73 | 12.96 | -5.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PY | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 1.71 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.75 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.71 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.65 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
PY vs. YLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than YLD's maximum drawdown of -28.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and YLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PY | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -28.34% | -17.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -1.98% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | -5.62% | -12.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -13.89% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.44% | -28.34% | -17.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -0.37% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -2.70% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 0.57% | +1.28% |
Volatility
PY vs. YLD - Volatility Comparison
Principal Value ETF (PY) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) at 1.32%. This indicates that PY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PY | YLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 1.32% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 3.51% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 4.34% | +6.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 6.40% | +9.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 8.21% | +11.86% |
PY vs. YLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than YLD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PY vs. YLD - Dividend Comparison
PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than YLD's 7.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 2.13% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% | 0.00% |
YLD Principal Active High Yield ETF | 7.27% | 7.33% | 7.12% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 3.92% | 4.40% | 4.81% | 5.42% | 6.28% | 4.47% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PY and YLD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PY has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to YLD (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs YLD's -28.34%.
On 10-year performance, PY leads with 10.73% vs 5.80% for YLD. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, YLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PY has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 5.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for YLD.
YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 2.13% for PY.
PY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while YLD is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.39% for YLD.
YLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PY and YLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer