PY vs. DTD
PY (Principal Value ETF) and DTD (WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. PY is actively managed, while DTD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PY returned 10.80%/yr vs 12.16%/yr for DTD. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DTD.
Performance
PY vs. DTD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PY achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than DTD's 10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PY has underperformed DTD with an annualized return of 10.80%, while DTD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.
PY
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 13.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
DTD
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 22.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
PY vs. DTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PY Principal Value ETF | 3.34% | 7.74% | 16.79% | 9.11% | -5.10% | 34.83% | 2.71% | 26.87% | -13.34% | 18.87% |
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 10.23% | 14.25% | 18.56% | 10.63% | -3.83% | 26.26% | 2.45% | 28.19% | -6.47% | 17.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PY and DTD is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2016 | 0.70 |
The correlation between PY and DTD shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PY vs. DTD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PY
DTD
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
PY
DTD
Financial Services
PY
DTD
Healthcare
PY
DTD
Consumer Defensive
PY
DTD
Consumer Cyclical
PY
DTD
Industrials
PY
DTD
Energy
PY
DTD
Communication Services
PY
DTD
Utilities
PY
DTD
Basic Materials
PY
DTD
Real Estate
PY
DTD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PY vs. DTD — Risk / Return Rank
PY
DTD
PY vs. DTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Value ETF (PY) and WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PY | DTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 3.54 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | 14.62 | -7.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PY vs. DTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PY drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, smaller than the maximum DTD drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PY and DTD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PY | DTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -58.19% | +12.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -6.30% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | -14.41% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.84% | -16.14% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.44% | -37.29% | -8.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -1.07% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.03% | -7.33% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.52% | +0.33% |
Volatility
PY vs. DTD - Volatility Comparison
Principal Value ETF (PY) and WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PY | DTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.71% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 7.13% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 9.41% | +1.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 13.58% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 16.22% | +3.85% |
PY vs. DTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DTD's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
PY vs. DTD - Dividend Comparison
PY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than DTD's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 1.87% | 1.99% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.04% | 2.73% | 2.50% | 2.93% | 2.36% | 2.66% | 2.81% |
PY Principal Value ETF | 2.15% | 2.14% | 2.22% | 2.68% | 3.02% | 2.83% | 2.95% | 2.25% | 2.34% | 1.68% | 1.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PY and DTD have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PY has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to DTD (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PY dropped -45.44% vs DTD's -58.19%.
On 10-year performance, DTD leads with 12.16% vs 10.80% for PY. On fees, PY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DTD has performed better with a 12.16% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DTD.
PY has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.87% for DTD.
They also come from different issuers: Principal and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PY and 0.28% for DTD.
DTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PY and DTD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer