PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXWIX vs. NVLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXWIX vs. NVLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Leadership Fund Institutional Class (PXWIX) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXWIX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than NVLIX's 9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PXWIX has underperformed NVLIX with an annualized return of 10.81%, while NVLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.75% annualized return.


PXWIX

1D
0.70%
1M
4.72%
YTD
10.59%
6M
12.72%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
10.81%

NVLIX

1D
0.98%
1M
8.08%
YTD
9.30%
6M
8.36%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*
17.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXWIX vs. NVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXWIX
Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Leadership Fund Institutional Class
10.59%17.72%12.41%18.41%-19.77%17.58%13.94%26.80%-7.55%25.15%
NVLIX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I
9.30%12.76%29.48%43.60%-31.31%27.62%37.97%33.54%3.02%33.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PXWIX and NVLIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2009

0.86

The correlation between PXWIX and NVLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXWIX vs. NVLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXWIX
PXWIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PXWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PXWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NVLIX
NVLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NVLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NVLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXWIX vs. NVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Leadership Fund Institutional Class (PXWIX) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXWIXNVLIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

1.45

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

2.00

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

1.24

+1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.81

3.85

+7.96

PXWIX vs. NVLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXWIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the NVLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXWIX and NVLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXWIXNVLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.45

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.61

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.81

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.81

-0.45

Drawdowns

PXWIX vs. NVLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXWIX drawdown since its inception was -53.56%, which is greater than NVLIX's maximum drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXWIX and NVLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXWIXNVLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.56%

-39.57%

-13.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-19.01%

+9.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.31%

-23.94%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.52%

-39.57%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.47%

-39.57%

+5.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-6.19%

-3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

6.13%

-3.97%

Volatility

PXWIX vs. NVLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Leadership Fund Institutional Class (PXWIX) is 3.32%, while Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that PXWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXWIXNVLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.62%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

11.97%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

16.10%

-4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

22.36%

-6.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.98%

22.04%

-5.06%

PXWIX vs. NVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXWIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than NVLIX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXWIX vs. NVLIX - Dividend Comparison

PXWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, less than NVLIX's 20.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVLIX
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I
20.54%22.45%14.35%5.39%8.93%9.51%5.47%8.69%18.81%18.70%17.11%15.18%
PXWIX
Pax Ellevate Global Women’s Leadership Fund Institutional Class
9.02%9.98%9.64%1.69%3.24%1.44%1.25%3.24%5.15%2.71%2.04%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXWIX and NVLIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVLIX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to PXWIX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXWIX dropped -53.56% vs NVLIX's -39.57%.

PXWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXWIX and NVLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer