PXSGX vs. ZTR
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR).
PXSGX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Jun 28, 2006. ZTR is an actively managed fund by Virtus. It was launched on Feb 24, 2005.
Performance
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -9.88% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 9.60% | 18.63% | 18.31% | -3.21% | -21.32% | 20.57% | -11.78% | 44.65% | -24.86% | 29.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -9.88% return, which is significantly lower than ZTR's 9.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PXSGX has outperformed ZTR with an annualized return of 9.92%, while ZTR has yielded a comparatively lower 6.63% annualized return.
PXSGX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -9.88%
- 6M
- -15.97%
- 1Y
- -23.38%
- 3Y*
- -3.82%
- 5Y*
- -5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
ZTR
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -4.23%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTR's 3.77% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PXSGX vs. ZTR — Risk / Return Rank
PXSGX
ZTR
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXSGX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | 1.61 | -2.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | 2.22 | -3.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.32 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 2.18 | -2.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | 9.41 | -11.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXSGX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 1.61 | -2.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.33 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.31 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.31 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSGX and ZTR is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Dividend Comparison
PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.16%, more than ZTR's 8.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 53.16% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 8.89% | 9.52% | 10.24% | 15.25% | 15.88% | 10.96% | 13.72% | 11.89% | 15.18% | 13.85% | 10.58% | 9.11% |
Drawdowns
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, smaller than the maximum ZTR drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and ZTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSGX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -57.25% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.55% | -11.17% | -17.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | -42.64% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | -57.25% | +14.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.54% | -4.23% | -36.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -9.38% | -2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.74% | 2.59% | +10.15% |
Volatility
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) at 4.85%. This indicates that PXSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PXSGX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 4.85% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 8.53% | +4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 14.92% | +6.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 16.87% | +7.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 21.58% | +0.94% |