PXSGX vs. ZTR
PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) and ZTR (Virtus Total Return Fund) are both mutual funds - PXSGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus, while ZTR is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, PXSGX returned 10.25%/yr vs 6.34%/yr for ZTR. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PXSGX charges 1.07%/yr vs 3.77%/yr for ZTR.
Performance
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than ZTR's 12.86% return. Over the past 10 years, PXSGX has outperformed ZTR with an annualized return of 10.25%, while ZTR has yielded a comparatively lower 6.34% annualized return.
PXSGX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 1Y
- -13.56%
- 3Y*
- -2.84%
- 5Y*
- -5.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.33%
ZTR
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 20.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- 4.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $850.06K | $1.52M | $1.10M |
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -1.56% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 12.86% | 18.63% | 18.31% | -3.21% | -21.32% | 20.57% | -11.78% | 44.65% | -24.86% | 29.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSGX and ZTR is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2006 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PXSGX and ZTR has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXSGX vs. ZTR — Risk / Return Rank
PXSGX
ZTR
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXSGX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.31 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 2.85 | -3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 7.49 | -8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, smaller than the maximum ZTR drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and ZTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSGX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -57.25% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.52% | -7.07% | -19.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.49% | -23.06% | -19.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | -42.64% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | -57.25% | +14.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.05% | -1.61% | -33.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.96% | -9.32% | -2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.12% | 2.68% | +13.44% |
Volatility
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Virtus Total Return Fund (ZTR) at 2.74%. This indicates that PXSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXSGX | ZTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 2.74% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 9.17% | +4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 11.47% | +7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.93% | 16.71% | +8.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 21.62% | +1.01% |
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTR's 3.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXSGX vs. ZTR - Dividend Comparison
PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.67%, more than ZTR's 9.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 48.67% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
ZTR Virtus Total Return Fund | 9.05% | 9.52% | 10.24% | 15.25% | 15.88% | 10.96% | 13.72% | 11.89% | 15.18% | 13.85% | 10.58% | 9.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXSGX and ZTR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXSGX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to ZTR (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXSGX dropped -53.72% vs ZTR's -57.25%.
ZTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXSGX and ZTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer