PXSGX vs. EMCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX).
PXSGX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Jun 28, 2006. EMCAX is managed by Empiric Funds. It was launched on Nov 6, 1995.
Performance
PXSGX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PXSGX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -9.88% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | -0.57% | 2.37% | 13.89% | 12.43% | -16.06% | 16.07% | 27.81% | 19.10% | -4.64% | 21.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXSGX achieves a -9.88% return, which is significantly lower than EMCAX's -0.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PXSGX having a 9.92% annualized return and EMCAX not far behind at 9.61%.
PXSGX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -9.88%
- 6M
- -15.97%
- 1Y
- -23.38%
- 3Y*
- -3.82%
- 5Y*
- -5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
EMCAX
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PXSGX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXSGX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PXSGX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank
PXSGX
EMCAX
PXSGX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXSGX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | 0.41 | -1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | 0.72 | -2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.09 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 0.74 | -1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | 3.00 | -4.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXSGX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 0.41 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.12 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.48 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between PXSGX and EMCAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PXSGX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison
PXSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.16%, more than EMCAX's 0.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 53.16% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 7.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PXSGX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXSGX drawdown since its inception was -53.72%, roughly equal to the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXSGX and EMCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXSGX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -51.81% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.55% | -10.15% | -18.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.49% | -30.60% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.49% | -42.79% | +0.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.54% | -6.22% | -34.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -13.33% | +1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.74% | 2.50% | +10.24% |
Volatility
PXSGX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) have volatilities of 5.59% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PXSGX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 5.42% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 10.49% | +2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 17.50% | +4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 18.18% | +6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 20.21% | +2.31% |