PXQSX vs. RFIMX
PXQSX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund) and RFIMX (Ranger Micro Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PXQSX returned -0.34%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for RFIMX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXQSX charges 0.96%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for RFIMX.
Performance
PXQSX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQSX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than RFIMX's 15.87% return.
PXQSX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- -1.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
RFIMX
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 15.87%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 26.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
PXQSX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQSX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund | 1.48% | -4.50% | 9.63% | 19.10% | -24.29% | 19.50% | 28.16% | 24.87% | -1.83% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 15.87% | 1.99% | 11.52% | 9.14% | -24.26% | 30.58% | 44.44% | 24.94% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQSX and RFIMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PXQSX and RFIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXQSX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank
PXQSX
RFIMX
PXQSX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXQSX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.26 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 3.20 | -3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 9.02 | -9.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXQSX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 1.53 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.00 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
PXQSX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQSX drawdown since its inception was -55.56%, smaller than the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQSX and RFIMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQSX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.56% | -99.41% | +43.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.25% | -9.11% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -99.41% | +76.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -99.41% | +67.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.79% | -99.12% | +86.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -29.26% | +18.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.24% | 3.23% | +3.01% |
Volatility
PXQSX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) is 4.72%, while Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that PXQSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXQSX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 5.79% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 13.68% | -1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 19.11% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 5,369.96% | -5,349.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 4,402.70% | -4,382.19% |
PXQSX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQSX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXQSX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison
PXQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than RFIMX's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQSX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund | 5.73% | 5.81% | 4.90% | 2.99% | 3.37% | 1.76% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 2.54% | 5.32% | 8.89% | 7.58% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 1.14% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 47.82% | 71.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXQSX and RFIMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFIMX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to PXQSX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQSX dropped -55.56% vs RFIMX's -99.41%.
RFIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXQSX and RFIMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer