PXQSX vs. CMCIX
PXQSX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, PXQSX returned -1.70% vs -0.28% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXQSX charges 0.96%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
PXQSX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQSX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than CMCIX's 2.66% return.
PXQSX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- -1.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.15%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.49%
CMCIX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- -0.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXQSX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQSX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund | 1.48% | -4.50% | 9.63% | 13.90% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 2.66% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQSX and CMCIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between PXQSX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXQSX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
PXQSX
CMCIX
PXQSX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXQSX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 0.09 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 0.20 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXQSX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 0.07 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.34 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
PXQSX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQSX drawdown since its inception was -55.56%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQSX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQSX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.56% | -21.50% | -34.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.25% | -11.68% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.79% | -9.96% | -2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -6.45% | -3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.24% | 4.99% | +1.25% |
Volatility
PXQSX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund (PXQSX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.90%. This indicates that PXQSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXQSX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 3.90% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 10.59% | +1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 15.15% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 16.54% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 16.54% | +3.97% |
PXQSX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQSX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXQSX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
PXQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than CMCIX's 4.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.14% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXQSX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund | 5.73% | 5.81% | 4.90% | 2.99% | 3.37% | 1.76% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 2.54% | 5.32% | 8.89% | 7.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, PXQSX and CMCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PXQSX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to CMCIX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQSX dropped -55.56% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
CMCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXQSX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer