PXQ vs. IXN
PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index while IXN tracks the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXQ returned 18.83%/yr vs 23.45%/yr for IXN. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PXQ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXN.
Performance
PXQ vs. IXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 40.12% return, which is significantly higher than IXN's 26.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQ has underperformed IXN with an annualized return of 18.83%, while IXN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.45% annualized return.
PXQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- 6M
- 31.73%
- YTD
- 40.12%
- 1Y
- 63.92%
- 3Y*
- 33.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.31%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.22%
IXN
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- 6M
- 24.00%
- YTD
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 42.54%
- 3Y*
- 28.76%
- 5Y*
- 18.70%
- 10Y*
- 23.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.45M | $52.86M | $65.01M | |
| $741.37K | $822.66K | $837.91K |
PXQ vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 40.12% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 39.14% | 26.35% | 5.78% | 15.41% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 26.51% | 25.25% | 24.84% | 52.98% | -29.86% | 29.58% | 43.62% | 47.88% | -5.44% | 41.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQ and IXN is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PXQ and IXN shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXQ vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank
PXQ
IXN
PXQ vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXQ | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.25 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 2.49 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 7.63 | +5.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXQ vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, roughly equal to the maximum IXN drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and IXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQ | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -55.67% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.91% | -16.09% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -25.55% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | -36.30% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | -36.30% | +1.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.80% | -11.29% | -3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -11.24% | +0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 5.23% | -0.55% |
Volatility
PXQ vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) at 10.37%. This indicates that PXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXQ | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.26% | 10.37% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.68% | 23.76% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.67% | 27.43% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 25.89% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.55% | 24.88% | -1.33% |
PXQ vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXQ vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison
PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than IXN's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.83% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, PXQ and IXN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PXQ has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to IXN (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs IXN's -55.67%.
On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 23.45% vs 18.83% for PXQ. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IXN has been the lower-risk option at 10.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 23.45% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.
IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.68% for PXQ.
PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PXQ and 0.46% for IXN.
PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXQ and IXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer