PXQ vs. ITEQ
PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and ITEQ (BlueStar Israel Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index while ITEQ tracks the BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PXQ returned 21.78%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for ITEQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXQ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ITEQ.
Performance
PXQ vs. ITEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 62.92% return, which is significantly higher than ITEQ's 12.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQ has outperformed ITEQ with an annualized return of 21.78%, while ITEQ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.97% annualized return.
PXQ
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 11.48%
- YTD
- 62.92%
- 6M
- 64.99%
- 1Y
- 101.94%
- 3Y*
- 43.56%
- 5Y*
- 20.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.78%
ITEQ
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.13%
- 5Y*
- -1.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
PXQ vs. ITEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 62.92% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 39.14% | 26.35% | 5.78% | 15.41% |
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 12.36% | 13.71% | 11.70% | 4.70% | -30.36% | -8.04% | 58.96% | 37.59% | -0.63% | 26.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQ and ITEQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between PXQ and ITEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PXQ vs. ITEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PXQ
ITEQ
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PXQ
ITEQ
Communication Services
PXQ
ITEQ
Real Estate
PXQ
ITEQ
-
Industrials
PXQ
ITEQ
Financial Services
PXQ
ITEQ
Basic Materials
PXQ
-
ITEQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
PXQ
-
ITEQ
Consumer Defensive
PXQ
-
ITEQ
-
Energy
PXQ
-
ITEQ
Healthcare
PXQ
-
ITEQ
Utilities
PXQ
-
ITEQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXQ vs. ITEQ — Risk / Return Rank
PXQ
ITEQ
PXQ vs. ITEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXQ | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.17 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.34 | 1.82 | +6.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.40 | 4.70 | +31.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXQ vs. ITEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, roughly equal to the maximum ITEQ drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and ITEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQ | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -54.63% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.30% | -13.07% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -26.78% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | -50.29% | +15.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | -54.63% | +20.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -16.75% | +15.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -18.50% | +7.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 5.05% | -2.24% |
Volatility
PXQ vs. ITEQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a higher volatility of 14.46% compared to BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) at 10.08%. This indicates that PXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXQ | ITEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.46% | 10.08% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.94% | 18.76% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.55% | 23.86% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 25.19% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 23.52% | -0.22% |
PXQ vs. ITEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ITEQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXQ vs. ITEQ - Dividend Comparison
PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, which matches ITEQ's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITEQ BlueStar Israel Technology ETF | 0.75% | 0.85% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.59% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXQ and ITEQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXQ has higher volatility (14.46%) compared to ITEQ (10.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs ITEQ's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, PXQ leads with 21.78% vs 10.97% for ITEQ. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ITEQ has been the lower-risk option at 10.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 21.78% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.
PXQ and ITEQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.75%.
PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PXQ and 0.75% for ITEQ.
PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXQ and ITEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer