PXQ vs. FCLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) and Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD).
PXQ and FCLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PXQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Networking Intellidex Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005. FCLD is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 5, 2021. Both PXQ and FCLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PXQ vs. FCLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PXQ vs. FCLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF | 5.86% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 9.34% |
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | -7.04% | 8.19% | 21.80% | 53.05% | -41.32% | -1.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than FCLD's -7.04% return.
PXQ
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 41.49%
- 3Y*
- 23.88%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.41%
FCLD
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 6M
- -5.64%
- 1Y
- 14.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PXQ vs. FCLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FCLD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PXQ vs. FCLD — Risk / Return Rank
PXQ
FCLD
PXQ vs. FCLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) and Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXQ | FCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 0.46 | +1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 0.89 | +1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.11 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 0.87 | +2.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.18 | 2.45 | +12.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXQ | FCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 0.46 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.06 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQ and FCLD is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PXQ vs. FCLD - Dividend Comparison
PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than FCLD's 0.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF | 0.88% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
FCLD Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PXQ vs. FCLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than FCLD's maximum drawdown of -50.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and FCLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQ | FCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -50.85% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.94% | -18.53% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.97% | -13.09% | +8.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -21.13% | +10.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 6.61% | -3.83% |
Volatility
PXQ vs. FCLD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF (PXQ) and Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) have volatilities of 8.36% and 8.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PXQ | FCLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 8.48% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.60% | 19.65% | -4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.35% | 32.17% | -8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 30.24% | -7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 30.24% | -7.52% |