PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXQ vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXQ vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 46.33% return, which is significantly higher than EINC's 28.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PXQ has outperformed EINC with an annualized return of 19.89%, while EINC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.77% annualized return.


PXQ

1D
-3.10%
1M
-4.12%
6M
40.49%
YTD
46.33%
1Y
69.84%
3Y*
36.29%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
19.89%

EINC

1D
1.55%
1M
1.87%
6M
30.32%
YTD
28.74%
1Y
32.69%
3Y*
28.67%
5Y*
22.43%
10Y*
11.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXQ vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXQ
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
46.33%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
28.74%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-19.85%-3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PXQ and EINC is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2012

0.32

The correlation between PXQ and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PXQ vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PXQ
EINC

Technology

60.5%

-

Communication Services

5.7%

-

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Industrials

0.1%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

99.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

0.6%

Technology

PXQ
60.5%
EINC

-

Communication Services

PXQ
5.7%
EINC

-

Real Estate

PXQ
3.0%
EINC

-

Industrials

PXQ
0.1%
EINC
0.6%

Financial Services

PXQ
0.0%
EINC

-

Basic Materials

PXQ

-

EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

PXQ

-

EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

PXQ

-

EINC

-

Energy

PXQ

-

EINC
99.4%

Healthcare

PXQ

-

EINC

-

Utilities

PXQ

-

EINC
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXQ vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXQ
PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXQ vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PXQEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

4.16

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.88

10.24

+10.64

PXQ vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXQ and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PXQ vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and EINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXQEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-87.55%

+30.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.30%

-7.89%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-16.01%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-19.87%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-68.85%

+34.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.02%

-2.40%

-8.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-44.01%

+33.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.20%

+0.15%

Volatility

PXQ vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a higher volatility of 13.42% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.06%. This indicates that PXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXQEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.42%

6.06%

+7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.37%

12.30%

+11.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.29%

15.42%

+10.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.25%

19.58%

+4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

25.34%

-1.94%

PXQ vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXQ vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than EINC's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
3.44%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
PXQ
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.65%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXQ and EINC have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXQ has higher volatility (13.42%) compared to EINC (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 10-year performance, PXQ leads with 19.89% vs 11.77% for EINC. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 19.89% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.65% for PXQ.

PXQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PXQ and 0.45% for EINC.

PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXQ and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer