PXQ vs. CRTC
PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PXQ returned 63.92% vs 14.54% for CRTC. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PXQ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.
Performance
PXQ vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 40.12% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 6.95% return.
PXQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- 6M
- 31.73%
- YTD
- 40.12%
- 1Y
- 63.92%
- 3Y*
- 33.13%
- 5Y*
- 16.31%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.22%
CRTC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 14.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $258.18K | $628.52K | $497.75K | |
| $741.37K | $822.66K | $837.91K |
PXQ vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 40.12% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 8.22% |
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 6.95% | 18.69% | 18.05% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXQ and CRTC is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PXQ and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXQ vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank
PXQ
CRTC
PXQ vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PXQ | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.16 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 1.42 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | 4.45 | +8.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PXQ vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and CRTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXQ | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -19.07% | -38.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.91% | -9.05% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.80% | -2.76% | -12.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -2.23% | -8.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.68% | 2.88% | +1.80% |
Volatility
PXQ vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.66%. This indicates that PXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXQ | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.26% | 3.66% | +7.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.68% | 10.80% | +13.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.67% | 13.91% | +13.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 15.77% | +8.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.55% | 15.77% | +7.78% |
PXQ vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXQ vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison
PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than CRTC's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 0.89% | 1.03% | 1.13% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXQ and CRTC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXQ has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to CRTC (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs CRTC's -19.07%.
On 1-year performance, PXQ leads with 63.92% vs 14.54% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 63.92% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for PXQ.
CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.68% for PXQ.
PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PXQ and 0.35% for CRTC.
PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PXQ and CRTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer