PXQ vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. PXQ is passively managed, while CHAT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PXQ returned 43.36%/yr vs 55.51%/yr for CHAT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PXQ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.

Performance

PXQ vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXQ achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 74.30% return.

PXQ

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 26.38%
• YTD: 63.41%
• 6M: 62.53%
• 1Y: 99.38%
• 3Y*: 43.36%
• 5Y*: 21.73%
• 10Y*: 21.42%

CHAT

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 27.78%
• YTD: 74.30%
• 6M: 73.13%
• 1Y: 144.01%
• 3Y*: 55.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXQ vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	63.41%	28.65%	19.41%	21.92%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	74.30%	49.85%	30.98%	19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between PXQ and CHAT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023	0.81

The correlation between PXQ and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

PXQ vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PXQ	CHAT
Technology	83.7%	76.5%
Communication Services	11.8%	16.6%
Real Estate	3.2%	-
Industrials	0.9%	0.8%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PXQ vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXQ

PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 94
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXQ vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PXQ	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.70	4.72	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.72	4.86	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.65	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.00	8.90	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	44.01	26.26	+17.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PXQ vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXQ Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is comparable to the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXQ and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PXQ	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.70	4.72	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	1.98	-1.40

Drawdowns

PXQ vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXQ drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXQ and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PXQ	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.18%	-31.34%	-25.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.99%	-16.28%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.40%	-31.34%	+9.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-0.66%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.74%	-5.35%	-5.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	5.51%	-3.24%

Volatility

PXQ vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) is 9.19%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 11.70%. This indicates that PXQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PXQ	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.19%	11.70%	-2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.12%	24.62%	-7.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.28%	30.74%	-9.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.19%	29.90%	-6.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.97%	29.90%	-6.93%

PXQ vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXQ vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than CHAT's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.64%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	0.57%	0.86%	1.38%	0.60%	2.24%	0.55%	0.18%	0.44%	1.22%	0.66%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PXQ and CHAT in my portfolio?

PXQ and CHAT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PXQ or CHAT?

CHAT has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to PXQ (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXQ dropped -57.18% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, PXQ or CHAT?

On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 55.51% vs 43.36% for PXQ. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PXQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PXQ or CHAT?

Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 55.51% return vs 43.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PXQ or CHAT?

PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PXQ or CHAT?

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.57% for PXQ.

What is the main difference between PXQ and CHAT?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PXQ and 0.75% for CHAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.72 vs 4.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.