PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXI vs. MTUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXI vs. MTUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 32.39% return, which is significantly lower than MTUL's 61.40% return.


PXI

1D
0.75%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
32.39%
6M
24.73%
1Y
46.96%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
5.94%

MTUL

1D
0.74%
1M
23.35%
YTD
61.40%
6M
63.02%
1Y
78.14%
3Y*
60.02%
5Y*
20.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXI vs. MTUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
32.39%3.86%0.76%5.48%45.85%41.37%
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
61.40%27.42%58.70%10.66%-37.97%7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PXI and MTUL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2021

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between PXI and MTUL has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXI vs. MTUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXI
PXI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUL
MTUL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MTUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUL Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXI vs. MTUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXIMTULDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

3.29

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

13.17

+0.17

PXI vs. MTUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the MTUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXI and MTUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXIMTULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.79

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.47

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.41

-0.25

Drawdowns

PXI vs. MTUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than MTUL's maximum drawdown of -56.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and MTUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXIMTULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.08%

-56.83%

-28.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-23.86%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.74%

-39.15%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.47%

-56.83%

+23.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-0.01%

-3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.43%

-22.66%

-6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

5.95%

-2.42%

Volatility

PXI vs. MTUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) is 7.81%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN (MTUL) has a volatility of 20.00%. This indicates that PXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXIMTULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

20.00%

-12.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

37.62%

-21.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

43.98%

-22.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.47%

42.80%

-9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

43.63%

-6.45%

PXI vs. MTUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXI vs. MTUL - Dividend Comparison

PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while MTUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
1.28%1.81%1.52%1.82%3.14%0.57%1.72%2.80%0.93%0.80%0.73%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXI and MTUL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUL has higher volatility (20.00%) compared to PXI (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXI dropped -85.08% vs MTUL's -56.83%.

On 5-year performance, MTUL leads with 20.13% vs 16.60% for PXI. On fees, PXI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUL has performed better with a 20.13% return vs 16.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MTUL.

PXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for MTUL.

PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while MTUL tracks MSCI USA Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.95% for MTUL.

PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXI and MTUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer