PXI vs. MLPI
PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) and MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PXI is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index, while MLPI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Neos. PXI is passively managed, while MLPI is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PXI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.
Performance
PXI vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 32.39% return, which is significantly higher than MLPI's 18.70% return.
PXI
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 32.39%
- 6M
- 24.73%
- 1Y
- 46.96%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.60%
- 10Y*
- 5.94%
MLPI
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- 18.70%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXI vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 32.39% | 2.03% |
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 18.70% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PXI and MLPI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PXI vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank
PXI
MLPI
PXI vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PXI | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PXI | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 3.69 | -3.52 |
Drawdowns
PXI vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and MLPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PXI | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.08% | -5.38% | -79.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -2.92% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.43% | -1.28% | -28.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | — | — |
Volatility
PXI vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PXI | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 13.05% | +8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.47% | 13.05% | +20.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.18% | 13.05% | +24.13% |
PXI vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
PXI vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison
PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than MLPI's 5.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 5.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.28% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PXI and MLPI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PXI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PXI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.
MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 1.28% for PXI.
PXI is categorized as Momentum, while MLPI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.68% for MLPI.
Find the right allocation for PXI and MLPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer