PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXI vs. MLPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXI vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 32.39% return, which is significantly higher than MLPI's 18.70% return.


PXI

1D
0.75%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
32.39%
6M
24.73%
1Y
46.96%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
5.94%

MLPI

1D
0.96%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
18.70%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXI vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PXI and MLPI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025

0.68

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXI vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXI
PXI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXI vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXIMLPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

PXI vs. MLPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXIMLPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

3.69

-3.52

Drawdowns

PXI vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and MLPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXIMLPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.08%

-5.38%

-79.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-2.92%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.43%

-1.28%

-28.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

Volatility

PXI vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXIMLPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

13.05%

+8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.47%

13.05%

+20.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

13.05%

+24.13%

PXI vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXI vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than MLPI's 5.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPI
Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
5.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
1.28%1.81%1.52%1.82%3.14%0.57%1.72%2.80%0.93%0.80%0.73%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXI and MLPI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PXI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PXI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 1.28% for PXI.

PXI is categorized as Momentum, while MLPI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.68% for MLPI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXI and MLPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer