PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PXI vs. FLMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PXI vs. FLMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXI achieves a 32.39% return, which is significantly higher than FLMI's 2.39% return.


PXI

1D
0.75%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
32.39%
6M
24.73%
1Y
46.96%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
5.94%

FLMI

1D
0.08%
1M
0.98%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.77%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXI vs. FLMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
32.39%3.86%0.76%5.48%45.85%75.05%-35.91%1.67%-27.56%24.71%
FLMI
Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF
2.39%5.89%4.91%7.89%-10.23%4.06%6.11%6.71%0.29%-0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between PXI and FLMI is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PXI and FLMI has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.27, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PXI vs. FLMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXI
PXI Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FLMI
FLMI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FLMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXI vs. FLMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PXIFLMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.61

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

2.85

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

10.27

+3.07

PXI vs. FLMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FLMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXI and FLMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PXIFLMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.67

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.50

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.65

-0.49

Drawdowns

PXI vs. FLMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXI drawdown since its inception was -85.08%, which is greater than FLMI's maximum drawdown of -14.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXI and FLMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PXIFLMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.08%

-14.66%

-70.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

-2.90%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.74%

-5.31%

-25.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.47%

-14.66%

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-0.25%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.43%

-2.82%

-26.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

0.80%

+2.73%

Volatility

PXI vs. FLMI - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) at 1.00%. This indicates that PXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PXIFLMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

1.00%

+6.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

2.03%

+14.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.36%

3.09%

+18.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.47%

4.45%

+29.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

4.72%

+32.46%

PXI vs. FLMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMI's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PXI vs. FLMI - Dividend Comparison

PXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than FLMI's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLMI
Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF
3.87%3.89%4.08%3.71%3.08%2.22%2.09%2.71%2.41%0.34%0.00%0.00%
PXI
Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF
1.28%1.81%1.52%1.82%3.14%0.57%1.72%2.80%0.93%0.80%0.73%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PXI and FLMI have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PXI has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to FLMI (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXI dropped -85.08% vs FLMI's -14.66%.

On 5-year performance, PXI leads with 16.60% vs 2.22% for FLMI. On fees, FLMI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PXI has performed better with a 16.60% return vs 2.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLMI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.

FLMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 1.28% for PXI.

PXI is categorized as Momentum, while FLMI is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PXI and 0.30% for FLMI.

FLMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PXI and FLMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer