PXE vs. USNG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PXE (Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF) and USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. PXE is passively managed, while USNG is actively managed. Over the past year, PXE returned 20.57% vs 44.34% for USNG. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PXE charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for USNG.

Performance

PXE vs. USNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PXE achieves a 21.52% return, which is significantly lower than USNG's 34.67% return.

PXE

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -9.46%
• YTD: 21.52%
• 6M: 22.13%
• 1Y: 20.57%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: 15.22%
• 10Y*: 8.03%

USNG

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 34.67%
• 6M: 34.92%
• 1Y: 44.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PXE vs. USNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PXE Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF	21.52%	3.15%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	34.67%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PXE and USNG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025	0.36

Return for Risk

PXE vs. USNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXE

PXE Risk / Return Rank: 24
PXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
PXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
PXE Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
PXE Martin Ratio Rank: 26

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 90
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 85
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PXE vs. USNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PXE	USNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	2.67	-1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	3.63	-2.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.45	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	6.54	-5.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.26	19.66	-16.39

PXE vs. USNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PXE Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the USNG Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PXE and USNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PXE vs. USNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PXE drawdown since its inception was -83.99%, which is greater than USNG's maximum drawdown of -6.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PXE and USNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PXE	USNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.99%	-6.82%	-77.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.70%	-6.82%	-9.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.95%	-1.74%	-14.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.95%	-1.52%	-26.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.32%	2.26%	+4.06%

Volatility

PXE vs. USNG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF (PXE) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) at 6.32%. This indicates that PXE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PXE	USNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.89%	6.32%	+2.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.02%	12.52%	+8.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.72%	16.70%	+11.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.65%	16.62%	+17.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.99%	16.62%	+20.37%

PXE vs. USNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PXE has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than USNG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

PXE vs. USNG - Dividend Comparison

PXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than USNG's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PXE Invesco Dynamic Energy Exploration & Production ETF	1.97%	2.98%	2.54%	2.78%	3.03%	1.86%	4.10%	1.70%	1.29%	1.54%	6.62%	2.58%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.10%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PXE and USNG in my portfolio?

PXE and USNG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PXE or USNG?

PXE has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to USNG (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PXE dropped -83.99% vs USNG's -6.82%.

Which ETF is better, PXE or USNG?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 44.34% vs 20.57% for PXE. On fees, USNG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, USNG has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PXE or USNG?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 44.34% return vs 20.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PXE or USNG?

USNG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PXE or USNG?

PXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.10% for USNG.

What is the main difference between PXE and USNG?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for PXE and 0.59% for USNG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.